Cotto-Pacman needs to happen.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • F l i c k e r
    Il Principe
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 20737
    • 1,323
    • 858
    • 83,771

    #1

    Cotto-Pacman needs to happen.

    I dont feel like writing something super long, so here it goes short.

    Cotto-Pacman needs to happen for 1 reason, Mayweather. If Cotto beats Pacman, there is a big chance of that happening because Cotto is the bigger man and isn't Ricky Hatton or dehydrated ODLH. So, anyways. Cotto beats Pacquiao right? Then Mayweather beats JMM, which is going to happen anyways, regardless of what anyone says. Cotto-Mayweather is going to happen. There is no other option for Mayweather if Cotto beats Pacquiao. No point in fighting Pacquiao once his "invincible aura" has been taken down.

    So, essentially. Cotto-Pacman needs to happen. For the sole reason of seeing Mayweather fight a legit WW. Isn't that what everyone has been wanting to see for basically, Mayweather's entire time in the WW division? Arum is smarter than I thought.

    If everything plays out like what I wrote above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. He is a *****. Im a fan of him but if it plays out like stated above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. I cant be a fan of his any longer.
  • Ch@mpBox@PR
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 21432
    • 432
    • 279
    • 22,261

    #2
    Great Post dude!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Comment

    • JACK D. RIPPER
      Banned
      • May 2009
      • 5156
      • 237
      • 91
      • 5,854

      #3
      Originally posted by F l i c k e r
      I dont feel like writing something super long, so here it goes short.

      Cotto-Pacman needs to happen for 1 reason, Mayweather. If Cotto beats Pacman, there is a big chance of that happening because Cotto is the bigger man and isn't Ricky Hatton or dehydrated ODLH. So, anyways. Cotto beats Pacquiao right? Then Mayweather beats JMM, which is going to happen anyways, regardless of what anyone says. Cotto-Mayweather is going to happen. There is no other option for Mayweather if Cotto beats Pacquiao. No point in fighting Pacquiao once his "invincible aura" has been taken down.

      So, essentially. Cotto-Pacman needs to happen. For the sole reason of seeing Mayweather fight a legit WW. Isn't that what everyone has been wanting to see for basically, Mayweather's entire time in the WW division? Arum is smarter than I thought.

      If everything plays out like what I wrote above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. He is a *****. Im a fan of him but if it plays out like stated above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. I cant be a fan of his any longer.
      Flicker posts like this are like kryptonite to the **** for brains that plague this site.
      They're immune to logic and are gonna call you: idiot, loser, douchebag, kill yourself, etc...

      Comment

      • jri9d0
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 5107
        • 190
        • 0
        • 12,323

        #4
        Originally posted by F l i c k e r
        I dont feel like writing something super long, so here it goes short.

        Cotto-Pacman needs to happen for 1 reason, Mayweather. If Cotto beats Pacman, there is a big chance of that happening because Cotto is the bigger man and isn't Ricky Hatton or dehydrated ODLH. So, anyways. Cotto beats Pacquiao right? Then Mayweather beats JMM, which is going to happen anyways, regardless of what anyone says. Cotto-Mayweather is going to happen. There is no other option for Mayweather if Cotto beats Pacquiao. No point in fighting Pacquiao once his "invincible aura" has been taken down.

        So, essentially. Cotto-Pacman needs to happen. For the sole reason of seeing Mayweather fight a legit WW. Isn't that what everyone has been wanting to see for basically, Mayweather's entire time in the WW division? Arum is smarter than I thought.



        If everything plays out like what I wrote above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. He is a *****. Im a fan of him but if it plays out like stated above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. I cant be a fan of his any longer.
        I see your reasoning behind this, however Pacman has a good shot of beating Cotto for numerous reasons. I'm Puerto Rican and a diehard Cotto fan but also exercise logic in how this fight can play out. Everyone is putting all their stock in weight when truly it's the skill level of both men that should be assessed to determine the outcome. Not to dog my boy Cotto but Manny got more tools to exploit in many ways what has already been exploited from Cotto.

        Peace.

        Comment

        • -MAKAVELLI-
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 50080
          • 3,580
          • 2,792
          • 169,000

          #5
          Originally posted by F l i c k e r
          I dont feel like writing something super long, so here it goes short.

          Cotto-Pacman needs to happen for 1 reason, Mayweather. If Cotto beats Pacman, there is a big chance of that happening because Cotto is the bigger man and isn't Ricky Hatton or dehydrated ODLH. So, anyways. Cotto beats Pacquiao right? Then Mayweather beats JMM, which is going to happen anyways, regardless of what anyone says. Cotto-Mayweather is going to happen. There is no other option for Mayweather if Cotto beats Pacquiao. No point in fighting Pacquiao once his "invincible aura" has been taken down.

          So, essentially. Cotto-Pacman needs to happen. For the sole reason of seeing Mayweather fight a legit WW. Isn't that what everyone has been wanting to see for basically, Mayweather's entire time in the WW division? Arum is smarter than I thought.

          If everything plays out like what I wrote above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. He is a *****. Im a fan of him but if it plays out like stated above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. I cant be a fan of his any longer.




          dude, floyd dont want none of miguel...you think cotto beating the #1 p4p would make him grow balls? he didnt want none at '40, and he dont want none at '47


          look at his targets, marquez and pacquiao...before it was a rematch with hatton....floyd have a superfight at WW? lol

          Comment

          • Osirus022
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 1587
            • 62
            • 287
            • 7,709

            #6
            Originally posted by F l i c k e r
            I dont feel like writing something super long, so here it goes short.

            Cotto-Pacman needs to happen for 1 reason, Mayweather. If Cotto beats Pacman, there is a big chance of that happening because Cotto is the bigger man and isn't Ricky Hatton or dehydrated ODLH. So, anyways. Cotto beats Pacquiao right? Then Mayweather beats JMM, which is going to happen anyways, regardless of what anyone says. Cotto-Mayweather is going to happen. There is no other option for Mayweather if Cotto beats Pacquiao. No point in fighting Pacquiao once his "invincible aura" has been taken down.

            So, essentially. Cotto-Pacman needs to happen. For the sole reason of seeing Mayweather fight a legit WW. Isn't that what everyone has been wanting to see for basically, Mayweather's entire time in the WW division? Arum is smarter than I thought.

            If everything plays out like what I wrote above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. He is a *****. Im a fan of him but if it plays out like stated above and Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto. I cant be a fan of his any longer.
            Trust me when i tell u that even if Pac loses to Cotto Mayweather is going to find an excuse to fight Pac instead of Cotto!!!

            Comment

            • guzi815
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2005
              • 1086
              • 78
              • 62
              • 7,585

              #7
              weather you wanna call it "LOGIC", "BUSINESS", "THEORY", a freakin "HUNTCH".....this Post makes a lot of "SENCE". It doesn't neccessarily mean you must agree with it...but if you disagree...you will never know what hit you!!!

              Comment

              • F l i c k e r
                Il Principe
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 20737
                • 1,323
                • 858
                • 83,771

                #8
                Originally posted by Makavelli
                dude, floyd dont want none of miguel...you think cotto beating the #1 p4p would make him grow balls? he didnt want none at '40, and he dont want none at '47


                look at his targets, marquez and pacquiao...before it was a rematch with hatton....floyd have a superfight at WW? lol
                It's the only logical thing to happen if it plays out like I wrote. There is nothing Mayweather can possibly do or say that will make me agree with him in not fighting Cotto if Cotto beats Pacquiao. Fighting Mosley wont even make sense for not fighting Cotto, if the what I wrote happens.

                If Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto and everything had played out like I wrote. Im not a fan of Mayweather any longer.

                Comment

                • Osirus022
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 1587
                  • 62
                  • 287
                  • 7,709

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Jay Em Em
                  Flicker posts like this are like kryptonite to the **** for brains that plague this site.
                  They're immune to logic and are gonna call you: idiot, loser, douchebag, kill yourself, etc...

                  lmfao... smh

                  Comment

                  • jri9d0
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 5107
                    • 190
                    • 0
                    • 12,323

                    #10
                    Originally posted by F l i c k e r
                    It's the only logical thing to happen if it plays out like I wrote. There is nothing Mayweather can possibly do or say that will make me agree with him in not fighting Cotto if Cotto beats Pacquiao. Fighting Mosley wont even make sense for not fighting Cotto, if the what I wrote happens.

                    If Mayweather doesn't fight Cotto and everything had played out like I wrote. Im not a fan of Mayweather any longer.
                    This whole anomaly is still centered on the “if” factor no matter how many ways you slice this to anyone’s reasoning. My point in making my earlier post is to shed light on the possibility that Cotto can lose to Manny as hard as that pill is to swallow as a Cotto fan in myself to admit. As for Floyd, I think even if he opted to take the winner he would still make a stipulation at the bargaining table that would jeopardize the fight for either fighter (Cotto/Manny). There has already been proof of this through the ongoing verbal scuffles between Arum and Mayweather. So who really knows how this Labyrinth of politics and negotiating terms could effect would “could” be for any future fights with either fighter.

                    Peace

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP