that ko and win % mean *** all by themselves, its the kind of comp you do it against
wlad and vitali would definitely not have those ko and winning statistics if they were fighting in the 70's or in the 90's with bowe and holyfield etc
the reason guys like lewis and ali and holmes etc have lower ko% than wlad and vitali is because they all faced top talented contenders who were in great shape and came to fight, not scared blubberballs or hep B victims like chagayev
ali faced a murderers row list of ATG heavyweights like liston, foreman, frazier and fearsome top contenders like shavers etc
who did wlad and vitali face that can compare to that???? vitali fought lewis and got his face mangled, wlad beat chris byrd.... woopty ***ing do
like i said, statistics are misleading in boxing, very misleading, records and ko percentages indicate far less about a fighter than things like level of competition and the era you fought in
wlad and vitali would definitely not have those ko and winning statistics if they were fighting in the 70's or in the 90's with bowe and holyfield etc
the reason guys like lewis and ali and holmes etc have lower ko% than wlad and vitali is because they all faced top talented contenders who were in great shape and came to fight, not scared blubberballs or hep B victims like chagayev
ali faced a murderers row list of ATG heavyweights like liston, foreman, frazier and fearsome top contenders like shavers etc
who did wlad and vitali face that can compare to that???? vitali fought lewis and got his face mangled, wlad beat chris byrd.... woopty ***ing do
like i said, statistics are misleading in boxing, very misleading, records and ko percentages indicate far less about a fighter than things like level of competition and the era you fought in
Comment