Those against Pac/Cotto at 145 hating or legit criticism?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sandyvahra
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2004
    • 1451
    • 48
    • 0
    • 7,732

    #1

    Those against Pac/Cotto at 145 hating or legit criticism?

    There's been so many threads about this lately. Lets poll it. People saying pacman gets no credit for a win over Cotto at 145 - is it legit or is it hating?

    No need for discussion lets just vote.

    Personally I think the ones against it just want to see pacman lose, and give him a real legit shot at winning no matter the weight.
    9
    Hating
    55.56%
    5
    Legit
    44.44%
    4

    The poll is expired.

    Last edited by sandyvahra; 06-20-2009, 10:49 AM.
  • fcastro1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 3770
    • 89
    • 7
    • 10,064

    #2
    excuses pac fans are used to this by now.

    Comment

    • jrv1932
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jun 2006
      • 272
      • 7
      • 0
      • 6,574

      #3
      Only hating if it's for a title. No titles at catchweight!!!

      Originally posted by sandyvahra
      There's been so many threads about this lately. Lets poll it. People saying pacman gets no credit for a win over Cotto at 145 - is it legit or is it hating?

      No need for discussion lets just vote.

      Personally I think the ones against it just want to see pacman lose, and give him a real legit shot at winning no matter the weight.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP