More power? Haye or Foreman?

[JACK D. RIPPER]

wow..just wow

Thats exactly how I felt larry, lol..

[rambov]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>??????????????????????????>>>>>>>>............................

[pcortes_29]

u kdding? FOREMAN hands down

[wXh]

Foreman has by far far far far far more power.

1. Tyson
2. Foreman
3. Wlad Klitshcko

[knn]

Let us compare Haye with Foreman I = 1970ies (since Foreman II had a worse KOratio which would taint the result):

KOratio
Foreman I: 89%
Haye: 91%

Number of KOs
Foreman I: 42
Haye: 21

Quality of KOvictims (median)
Foreman I: 14-6 (= mainly bums)
Haye: 21-6 (much better)

Quality of non-bummy KOvictims (median) (non-bum = those who win 75%+)
Foreman I: 31-3 (good)
Haye: 31-2 (slightly better)

KOround (median)
Foreman I: Round 2
Haye: Round: 2

World Title Fight wins
Foreman I: 3
Haye: 2

KO-victim Weight (median)
Foreman I: 205 lbs
Haye: 197 lbs (mind you, this is at weigh-in, in the ring they are heavier).



In other words: It's not the clear case as some want it to be. Foreman I leads definitely in the NUMBER of KOs however.

The safest thing that we can say is: It's too early to judge Haye yet.