How do you score a round with 2 knockdowns?

[Fox McCloud]

I watched Richard Hall vs. Julian Letterlough the other day, and I was wondering how people would score a round like the first.

I thought Letterlough's knockdown was a lot better... he blasted Hall with an overhand left. Hall knocked Letterlough down with an inside punch that didn't look overly hard, but it was the punch that caused the knockdown, and it wasn't just because he was off balance.

Hall looked more hurt than Letterlough, but it looks like Hall overcame more to get off the canvas and then turn around to drop Letterlough.

Is there an inherent bias to score a round for the guy who got off the canvas to drop the other guy?

What do you all think?

[Spacey1991]

I watched Richard Hall vs. Julian Letterlough the other day, and I was wondering how people would score a round like the first.

I thought Letterlough's knockdown was a lot better... he blasted Hall with an overhand left. Hall knocked Letterlough down with an inside punch that didn't look overly hard, but it was the punch that caused the knockdown, and it wasn't just because he was off balance.

Hall looked more hurt than Letterlough, but it looks like Hall overcame more to get off the canvas and then turn around to drop Letterlough.

Is there an inherent bias to score a round for the guy who got off the canvas to drop the other guy?

What do you all think?

10-7 if the guy has been KD twice...

[FLY TY]

10-7 if the guy has been KD twice...

he means if each fighter KD the other fighter once....

9-8 or 9-9? or is it 10-9?

[Fox McCloud]

he means if each fighter KD the other fighter once....

9-8 or 9-9? or is it 10-9?

It's either 10-10, 10-9 or 10-8.

It's on the 10 point must, and only a point deduction from the referee can change that.

Anyway, I was just wondering if people had the bias of scoring it for the guy who went down first and then got up to knock the other guy down.

Even though I thought Letterlough's punch was a lot better that put Hall down, there was a voice in the back of my head telling me that Hall deserved that round.

[mECHsLAVE]

10 point must system. So it'd be 10-9

The only time you get 9-9s and 9-8s and all that is when a point is officially deducted by the ref.

[egreezy]

I say its 10-9 with the fighter who inflicted the most damage and controlled the round. Its one of the things that are left to the discretion of the judges and not set in concrete

[FLY TY]

It's either 10-10, 10-9 or 10-8.

It's on the 10 point must, and only a point deduction from the referee can change that.

Anyway, I was just wondering if people had the bias of scoring it for the guy who went down first and then got up to knock the other guy down.

Even though I thought Letterlough's punch was a lot better that put Hall down, there was a voice in the back of my head telling me that Hall deserved that round.

well i'd go 10-9 for the guy who i thought had the better round, regardless of who had the better KD....

unless 1 guy was clearly hurt bad by the KD.

[LEFTYGUNZZ]

I watched Richard Hall vs. Julian Letterlough the other day, and I was wondering how people would score a round like the first.

I thought Letterlough's knockdown was a lot better... he blasted Hall with an overhand left. Hall knocked Letterlough down with an inside punch that didn't look overly hard, but it was the punch that caused the knockdown, and it wasn't just because he was off balance.

Hall looked more hurt than Letterlough, but it looks like Hall overcame more to get off the canvas and then turn around to drop Letterlough.

Is there an inherent bias to score a round for the guy who got off the canvas to drop the other guy?

What do you all think?

Depends on what the rest of the round is like...If fighter A is landing at will gets the other guy hurt and you can clearly see him hurt and then he puts him down ...Fighter B gets up is still hurt but catches fighter A with something lucky? Maybe gets him with an offbalance shot I score round 10-9 for fighter B...If they are both giving each other the business in a closely contested round I would score it a 10-10 rounds....Lefty

[PittyPat]

What? I thought if a round has 2 guys suffering a KD each, then it'd be an 8-8 round. It doesn't matter who won the round, both guys were down and the points have to reflect that.

I completely disagree with 10-10 rounds (even though the only judge who seems to believe they exist is that cunting piece of fucking **** Larry O'Connell), but an 8-8 round seems logical.

[Ryn0]

Depending on whos KD was better and who won the rest of the round I'd say 10-9