Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bradley vs Campbell Done, Witter-Alexander Co-Feature?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by raycorey View Post
    Great for boxing, I like this sort of fights not just fights that involve the bigger names, Its about time he talk about different boxer and different names and these matchups provide us with different names to talk about.
    the thing is, is that with nate and bradley you get a champ risking his belt against a fighter who: not shop worn, not a ppv draw, not a huge payday etc. I have grown so weary of people arguing who is a bigger draw, whos numbers are here, whos made x amount of money to the point where i have basically come to a point where i sit around watching my collection of old fights just so i can think about something else other than say, the top 5 fighters in the sport right now.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by GetSumBrah View Post
      hopefully no cancellations or injury.
      I know.......it seems like thats the new thang now!

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Queen_Leia View Post
        Soupy won't last 6 rounds
        Yeah, for how much? Or are you just another big mouth on the computer? I'll bet you $10,000 heads up that Nate beats Bradley. Money up front in a 3rd party escrow so you dont get amnesia afterwards. I'll even bet more than that, but anything over 10 grand I have to get Vegas odds on. But I'm willing to do 10 grand heads up (even money) just to shut your big mouth.

        p.s. If you dont have the 10 grand liquid, then a car title, real estate deed, ***elry/art (with certified appraisals) or anything else of real value can be held in escrow instead of the cash.

        Time to put up or shut up.
        Last edited by OnePunch; 06-13-2009, 03:42 PM.

        Comment


        • #24
          Lets go nate!!!!!!!!

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
            Yeah, for how much? Or are you just another big mouth on the computer? I'll bet you $10,000 heads up that Nate beats Bradley. Money up front in a 3rd party escrow so you dont get amnesia afterwards. I'll even bet more than that, but anything over 10 grand I have to get Vegas odds on. But I'm willing to do 10 grand heads up (even money) just to shut your big mouth.

            p.s. If you dont have the 10 grand liquid, then a car title, real estate deed, ***elry/art (with certified appraisals) or anything else of real value can be held in escrow instead of the cash.

            Time to put up or shut up.
            LOL. what a response!

            Comment


            • #26
              Nice card.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
                Yeah, for how much? Or are you just another big mouth on the computer? I'll bet you $10,000 heads up that Nate beats Bradley. Money up front in a 3rd party escrow so you dont get amnesia afterwards. I'll even bet more than that, but anything over 10 grand I have to get Vegas odds on. But I'm willing to do 10 grand heads up (even money) just to shut your big mouth.

                p.s. If you dont have the 10 grand liquid, then a car title, real estate deed, ***elry/art (with certified appraisals) or anything else of real value can be held in escrow instead of the cash.

                Time to put up or shut up.
                That is ruthless, lol.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Putting the winners against eachother is a great idea, but I certainly wouldnt mind seeing the losers of these bouts facing eachother. Maybe they can put that on the same card too, styles make fights

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by El Jesus View Post
                    the thing is, is that with nate and bradley you get a champ risking his belt against a fighter who: not shop worn, not a ppv draw, not a huge payday etc. I have grown so weary of people arguing who is a bigger draw, whos numbers are here, whos made x amount of money to the point where i have basically come to a point where i sit around watching my collection of old fights just so i can think about something else other than say, the top 5 fighters in the sport right now.

                    Thats what the sport of boxing is going to, even the boxing fans who i thought would be talking about fights like this would rather ignore it for the same old "Top 5 fighters in the sports", I love fights like this and i genuinely cant wait for it.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      From an economic standpoint, adding Alexander-Witter to this card doesnt make any sense for the lead promoter (Gary Shaw). He has neither fighter, and would not only then be putting a co-feature on tv that he had no stake in, but would also incur the added WBC sanction fees for the fight (plus travel, hotel, etc. for the WBC officials). I'm not saying it won't happen, but my guess is that Showtime or King or someone would have to throw some money to Shaw otherwise it makes no sense for him.....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP