How'd you score the Barrera-Morales trilogy?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Noose
    AKA Bologna Panini
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2004
    • 12082
    • 1,040
    • 825
    • 44,455

    #11
    Barrera's combinations and speed was incredible in the 1st fight.

    Forgot how good he was.

    MAB won the 1st and 3rd.

    Comment

    • Breadbin
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 394
      • 16
      • 0
      • 534

      #12
      Originally posted by dans01234
      Just like I have no idea how anyone can score the third for Morales.

      It's all opinion.

      Morales won some big rounds in the first fight, obviously it's debatable.

      Yer true.

      Scoring is so subjective.

      Comment

      • Fox McCloud
        Mission Complete!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 18176
        • 789
        • 1,151
        • 26,037

        #13
        Originally posted by dans01234
        This trilogy is a wash, like I've always said. There's no right answer.

        If you ask me, Morales won the first and second, Barrera clearly won the third.
        I do think the trilogy is mainly a wash... it was super close regardless of how the fights went.

        I do think that Barrera showed that he is a better fighter head-to-head against Morales. His fighting style seemed to be poison to Morales. The third fight really showed how much Barrera's style negated Morales's.

        Originally posted by Breadbin
        You are the only person i have spoken too that thinks Morales won the 1st fight.
        Hyperion and a couple of others told me they thought Morales won the first fight. Morales did win a lot of the middle rounds pretty big.

        I do think Barrera won the first though.

        Originally posted by K-Nan
        The judges had the first two mixed up. 1 shoulda gone to MAB, 2 should have gone to Terrible..

        I had 3 for EM, too.

        That trilogy had some strange scoring, when you think about it.
        I think you voted wrong... it says you voted Morales, Barrera, Morales.

        I was about to give you the nickname Lederman.

        Comment

        • dans
          Journeyman
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2006
          • 6835
          • 212
          • 134
          • 13,712

          #14
          Originally posted by Breadbin
          Yer true.

          Scoring is so subjective.
          Hey the judges agreed with me! LOL

          It's all about what you like sometimes. Some people scored Dawson-Johnson clearly in Johnson's favor. I on the other hand, like the judges, thought Dawson won the majority of the rounds and the fight.

          And we wonder why there's so many controversial decisions.

          Comment

          • MANGLER
            Sex Tape Flop Artist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 30142
            • 1,705
            • 2,355
            • 46,598

            #15
            MAB wins I
            EM wins II
            MAB wins III

            Comment

            • Fox McCloud
              Mission Complete!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Apr 2007
              • 18176
              • 789
              • 1,151
              • 26,037

              #16
              Originally posted by dans01234
              Hey the judges agreed with me! LOL

              It's all about what you like sometimes. Some people scored Dawson-Johnson clearly in Johnson's favor. I on the other hand, like the judges, thought Dawson won the majority of the rounds and the fight.

              And we wonder why there's so many controversial decisions.
              The reason for this is because of who people pick as their favorite fighters.

              I'm not saying they are biased just because it's their favorite fighter, but...

              For instance, a Mayweather Jr. fan will likely score that fight for Chad Dawson. Why? Because they appreciate the slickster style, and have grown to give more credence to it.

              A Julio Cesar Chavez fan would likely score that fight for Johnson. It's because they see the similarities to Chavez's pressure that they have fallen in love with, and generally see clean punches outweighing volume of somewhat ineffective punches.

              It took me a long time to figure that out.

              Comment

              • dans
                Journeyman
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2006
                • 6835
                • 212
                • 134
                • 13,712

                #17
                Originally posted by DWiens421
                I do think the trilogy is mainly a wash... it was super close regardless of how the fights went.

                I do think that Barrera showed that he is a better fighter head-to-head against Morales. His fighting style seemed to be poison to Morales. The third fight really showed how much Barrera's style negated Morales's.
                That's why the trilogy is a wash. Morales probably won more rounds and had bigger rounds, but it was pretty clear that MAB was Morales' achilles heel.

                I still believe Morales is the better fighter of the two though.

                Comment

                • Fox McCloud
                  Mission Complete!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 18176
                  • 789
                  • 1,151
                  • 26,037

                  #18
                  Originally posted by dans01234
                  That's why the trilogy is a wash. Morales probably won more rounds and had bigger rounds, but it was pretty clear that MAB was Morales' achilles heel.

                  I still believe Morales is the better fighter of the two though.
                  Same here...

                  Wins over the people who beat Barrera are pretty damning resume vs. resume.

                  Morales sparks Jones in 4, while Barrera is 0-2 against him.

                  Barrera won about 3 rounds against Pacquiao, Morales beat him once, and had a very even bout to the point of the stoppage in the second fight.

                  Comment

                  • dans
                    Journeyman
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 6835
                    • 212
                    • 134
                    • 13,712

                    #19
                    [QUOTE=DWiens421;5468336]Same here...

                    Wins over the people who beat Barrera are pretty damning resume vs. resume.

                    Morales sparks Jones in 4, while Barrera is 0-2 against him.

                    Barrera won about 3 rounds against Pacquiao, Morales beat him once, and had a very even bout to the point of the stoppage in the second fight.[/QUOTE]

                    He gave it his all in the third fight also. He won a couple of the early rounds.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP