I dunno how you can say "i dont se how people actually think marquez beat pac" because most the rounds could of gone either way....just came down to what you personally thought....
like i had pac winning the first by 1 point....and the 2nd fight i had a draw....so i can understand how people had marquez winning...cos some rounds i was 55/45 for 1 person....someone else cld of saw tht the same but for jmm....
I dunno how you can say "i dont se how people actually think marquez beat pac" because most the rounds could of gone either way....just came down to what you personally thought....
like i had pac winning the first by 1 point....and the 2nd fight i had a draw....so i can understand how people had marquez winning...cos some rounds i was 55/45 for 1 person....someone else cld of saw tht the same but for jmm....
what i meant to say was i dont know how some could say "Marquez Clearly beat him" know what i mean.
I've said it 100's of times, and i'll say it again. "The knockdowns make the difference" Had Marquez stood on his feet, there very well could've been a different outcome!
it was a even 6-6 with the KD being the difference. The rounds that were to Pacquiao was obvious and the rounds to Marquez were obvious.
Marquez fought his ass off, and couldn't have did better. Pacquaios in and out timing was great, and Marquez timed him perfectly with counters in many rounds.
Pac won this fight, and i dont know why people say that Marquez got robbed. How did he get robbed in a Dead close fight?????
Look the fact of the matter is everyone is going to have their own biast opinions based on which fighter they like....that's the bottom line...so we can talk bout this and that and that and this till we blue in the face and neither side is going to consider the others point....bottom line they were close fights and on the record it shows one win for Pac and a tie.....we need a third fight....that's the only way we will be able to tell wuts wut when it comes to these two...
Comment