Andre Dirrell vs. Danny Jacobs

**Fenom** · 06-06-2009, 07:56 PM

im thinking Andre... at least at this point in their careers

both have speed, fundamentals, and defense so i think it'd be a great fight nonetheless

**Guest** · 06-06-2009, 07:58 PM

I think Dirrell would pot shot and not engage his way to victory like he did against Curtis Stevens.

I think Jacobs at this point is still learing even though he seems to fight every other week, which I like.

This would be a good fight down the road a couple of years.

**oldgringo** · 06-06-2009, 08:11 PM

Originally posted by jreckoning

I think Dirrell would pot shot and not engage his way to victory like he did against Curtis Stevens.

I think Jacobs at this point is still learing even though he seems to fight every other week, which I like.

This would be a good fight down the road a couple of years.

quite possibly the worst fight of all-time.

**Fenom** · 06-06-2009, 08:15 PM

Originally posted by jreckoning

I think Dirrell would pot shot and not engage his way to victory like he did against Curtis Stevens.

I think Jacobs at this point is still learing even though he seems to fight every other week, which I like.

This would be a good fight down the road a couple of years.

right... im wondering if Danny could adapt or even do the same, Jacobs aint no slouch in the speed department!

exactly...

Originally posted by oldgringo

quite possibly the worst fight of all-time.

i dont think so.... if you like watching technicians and appreciate the art of boxing, but if u like slugfests prolly aint gonna happen

**Doctor_Tenma** · 06-06-2009, 08:16 PM

Jacobs looked average in his last fight, he didn't look too good. Not too long ago, people were talking about how Danny Jacobs is the next best thing to come, I'm not sold on the guy. I got Dirrell by U.D.

**ACHlLLES** · 06-06-2009, 08:22 PM

What the hell, Danny Jacobs is new and was tested in his last fight by a fighter. Jacobs would end up KO'D or TKO'D, too much experience for Dirrell and not enough for Jacobs.

**warp1432** · 06-06-2009, 11:28 PM

I like Jacobs, but he's not experienced enough at this point. Dirrel would potshot his ass.

**Fox McCloud** · 06-07-2009, 04:32 AM

Originally posted by Busy

who ya got?

and how?

Dirrell with experience.

Originally posted by Busy

right... im wondering if Danny could adapt or even do the same, Jacobs aint no slouch in the speed department!

exactly...

i dont think so.... if you like watching technicians and appreciate the art of boxing, but if u like slugfests prolly aint gonna happen

Lederman said it was the worst he had ever seen, and he's seen a lot.

Listen, I'm a huge Dirrell fan (see the sig), and the ONLY reason I enjoyed this fight is because I thought it was funny that Dirrell was being a huge **** about everything. Taunting Stevens, dancing around, arrogantly running... it was all very funny to me.

Had I watched it live on the undercard of Malignaggi-N'dou 1... I would have been furious and would have never given Dirrell a chance to be one of my favorites, let alone be liked at all.

**Silencers** · 06-07-2009, 04:39 AM

It's too early for Jacobs, I don't like the way he leans straight back, a guy like Dirrell who likes to jump in with hooks would catch him without him seeing the shot coming. Jacobs needs more seasoning, in a few years this could be a very good fight.

Andre Dirrell vs. Danny Jacobs