Can Cotto and Mosley do the same thing as Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
ur right but i dont waste my time with the pacfans as they follow the sport because of one man...no ones bigger than the sport itself, i think most of pacquaio fans are casual boxing fans so it dnt matter much
the point of this thread was that people pic pacquiao beating welterweights because of his 2 wins against hatton and dlh when these welterweights (cotto, floyd, mosley) have either already beaten them or would murder themComment
-
To answer your thread question, No. Pacquiao started as a flyweight, they didn't. Now, to get back to your hate. Sure, Cotto and Mosley could do what Manny has at welter because they are...welterweights. But the fact that he's done it starting so low and maintaining speed and power, that's what sets him apart. Regardless who he's really fighting. A guy who started at flyweight and takes on the very elite at welterweight and didn't just UD his wins, he dominated and KOed, that's quite astonishing no matter how you look at it.Comment
-
i see your point, but in that case floyd is a flyweight too, because both of them at the age of 16 were the same weight, floyd was fighting as an amatuer while pacquiao was fighting as a pro.To answer your thread question, No. Pacquiao started as a flyweight, they didn't. Now, to get back to your hate. Sure, Cotto and Mosley could do what Manny has at welter because they are...welterweights. But the fact that he's done it starting so low and maintaining speed and power, that's what sets him apart. Regardless who he's really fighting. A guy who started at flyweight and takes on the very elite at welterweight and didn't just UD his wins, he dominated and KOed, that's quite astonishing no matter how you look at it.
pacquiao fought at 122 in 1999 while mayweather fought at 130 in 2001, the thing is, pacquiao is often picked to beat the top guys at welterweight when he hasn't proved anything there yet, do you disagree? yes cotto and mosley would do the same thing because they are welterweights, mayweather has already done it 2 years before in tougher circumstances and he moved up from a lower weight classes, the point is PEOPLE grow in weight with AGE, this is the case of both floyd and pacquiao because they were the same weight from the age 16 to now, just look up their fight night weights
my only point is people base it on the wins of hatton and dlh, when those guys are just names to add on true welterweights who would also beat them.Comment
-
he beat marquez it wasnt even close,he keeps destroying everyone they put in front of him and will knock mayweather out because his skills r so much better and cotto and mosley would be victims to pacs brutal combinations-a pachugger post
saving them some timeComment
-
pacquiao would ko chinny klitschko and haye on the same night.
mayweather? pacman KO 1 mayweather,cotto and mosley because he destroyed dlh and hatton!!!! and dlh and hatton would beat the crap out of mosley, cotto and mayweather!!!! common sense!!
morales was in his prime when he got the gift decision against pacquiao in the first fightComment
-
Remember the good ol days when welterweights fought welterweights and there was no such thing as weight drained. Bigger fighters didnt call out smaller fighters and whos ducking who and fighters fought the best in their weight divisions? wow, the good ol days....Comment
-
yeah, but he didn't make dlh quit.
no ****, mosley is 160+ on fight night.at this age he dominated margarito, how would mosley vs hatton go? i think mosley murders him
I dunno about the same night. I think at 154 dlh has a chance to outbox cotto and at 140 hatton could beat cotto.i think cotto beats the crap out of both dlh and hatton on the same night and i dont even like him tht much but im not a liar
not really. pbf, cotto, and mosley are all too big for pac.so...the point of this thread is people who pick pacman against pbf, cotto and mosley, its based on his two wins against oscar and hatton.
maybe they would, but they didn't.now who is to say that cotto and mosley dont do the same thing?
but he didn't stop himmosley already beat him in his prime twice
no doubt, mosley is a WW, hatton is a jr WW.and also would murder hatton.
at WW, but maybe not jr MW and jr WW respectively.cotto would do the same to both DLH and hatton
yeah, but pac stopped hatton in 2 and pac actually stopped dlhhatton and dlh both already lost to mayweather 2 years before in different conditions
yeah, but hatton wasn't in his best weight class(hatton was undefeated and with confidence of an undefeated fighter
DLH chose to fight Pac at 147, with that ring size, with that glove size. DLH had a choice.and DLH was 2 years younger, chose the ring size, glove size, the comfortable weight).
we'll never know. its all speculationwouldn't cotto or mosley do the same thing if not earlier to hatton and dlh?
its not so much styles, as cotto and mosley are middleweights on fight night and pac is only a welterweight. is that fair?and yes styles do make fights, but cotto and mosley are nightmares for pacquiao
he's not the best, he couldn't land a body punch on margo while mosley landed them at will.(cotto the best body puncher in the game
yeah, but he gases and pac doesn't.and skilled boxer puncher who wears u down
I dunno about quicker. Mosley is for sure alot stronger than pac, that's why its a mismatch.+ mosley quicker, stronger, skilled version of pacman who killed margarito...
Pac didn't tell DLH to eat deer meat or rehydrate too late.and beat de la hoya when he wasnt a zombie
pacquiao hasnt been tested against true welterweights in their prime yet
um... pac is a jr. WW. why does he need to be tested against true WWs?
just ignore them.he is picked to win against some of them by his fanboysComment


Comment