who's the better southpaw: hagler or pacquaio???

[rocky_balboa23]

Size can give you a reach advantage, but it bares no skill advantage.

but which would u prefer? Pac's career or Hagler's career? I would choose Pacs..bout u?

[skullduggery]

first of all hagler is 5'9, not 6'3 lol.

second off he lost a SPLIT DECISION to the greatest boxer in the last 30 years.

yea we were talking about hearns...... maybe if u were to mind ur own ****in business, u wouldnt look so ******...... and sugar ray is not the best in the past 30 years. not with the likes of tyson lurking around. how about lennox lewis, roy jone, bernard hopkins........ cut that **** out man i cant ****in stand when asses like u over rate fighters from back then!

[portuge puncher]

but which would u prefer? Pac's career or Hagler's career? I would choose Pacs..bout u?

hagler.

i wouldent mind being the greatest MW of all time,
defending my title 12 times in the last golden era.

[rocky_balboa23]

first off i said looks like ****. second off, if ur 6"3, u better be able to outbox any welter weight. dont try to pull that **** over here. how about we talk about hearns disrespectful ass glass jaw. how about that. How about we talk about how marvin hagler lost to a man coming off a 3 year layoff and coming up in weight.......

now this man is talking..yeah Hearns has weak chin and stamina..probably coz he was trying all he could to squeeze that body into the welter..that's probably the reason y his punch against Duran(lightweight) was so devastating..lol but still Hearns has that flicker jab..that was a thing of beauty

[portuge puncher]

yea we were talking about hearns...... maybe if u were to mind ur own ****in business, u wouldnt look so ******......

ur still wrong motha ****a, hearns is a little less then 6'1

[-EX-]

but which would u prefer? Pac's career or Hagler's career? I would choose Pacs..bout u?

I'd prefer Hagler as far as boxing goes. Hagler had to beat a lotta people to be considered the best. He was always overshadowed by the golden boys of his era...he's highly respected though.

[skullduggery]

ur still wrong motha ****a, hearns is a little less then 6'1

at 147, which makes him a *****........ like i said man manny mighht have this one in a couple fights. i didnt vote though

[Steak]

first off i said looks like ****. second off, if ur 6"3, u better be able to outbox any welter weight. dont try to pull that **** over here. how about we talk about hearns disrespectful ass glass jaw. how about that. How about we talk about how marvin hagler lost to a man coming off a 3 year layoff and coming up in weight.......

so taller man=better boxer, eh? shame, shame...

'glass' jaw or not, Hearns has unbelievable wins. even at the tailend of his career, he beat Virgil Hill, who was still a cruiserweight champion in the 2000s in his 40s...and he did it years before Roy Jones or Darius, too...I think Hearns even had a win over a former Cruiserweight champion, despite being totally shopworn and about 40...

Im sorry for being so blunt, but you have no idea what youre talking about.

[rocky_balboa23]

hagler.

i wouldent mind being the greatest MW of all time,
defending my title 12 times in the last golden era.

was the reign of Hagler 8 year? how bout the reign of Bhop? and the resume of Bhop? it's arguable but Hagler has a very strong case..still I think in years to come, people will talk bout the greatness of PAC esp if he beats MOney..while many people will also talk bout the Fab Four,Hagler just being one of them..Pac is greatness in the current era of boxing..

[krispy kreme]

and it also doesnt prove greatness to outbox someone when u clearly have the size to do so....... just like p.will got no props from me under 154......

Boxing skills, and height or size, are irrelevant to each other.

yea we were talking about hearns...... maybe if u were to mind ur own ****in business, u wouldnt look so ******...... and sugar ray is not the best in the past 30 years. not with the likes of tyson lurking around. how about lennox lewis, roy jone, bernard hopkins........ cut that **** out man i cant ****in stand when asses like u over rate fighters from back then!

I like Tyson as much as the next guy, but there is no way he could be considered greater than Leonard, neither can Lewis. Jones and Hopkins can be rightfully judged a few years after they retire, but I doubt they rate higher than Leonard.