David Haye Was Medically Cleared For July 25 To Fight

[knn]

I'll ignore the rest of your comments... as not being worthy of an answer.

Always the same. As soon as fans of the overhyped 70ies are confronted with facts they have only answers like "**** you" or "worst post ever" or "your post is too ridiculous to even bother as everyone who understands boxing knows that Ali was the greatest".

Every opinion is allowed as long as the 70ies boxers are "sumthin special".

Muhammad = "God"
Larry Holmes = "Jesus"
Muhammad's opponents (Frazier, Foreman, Young, Liston,... ) = "Best boxers ever"

Tyson? "Overrated!"
Lennox? "OK, we grant him a place somewhere in the top30"
Klitschko? "Bum in the worst era"
Valuev? "Terrible"
Povetkin? Chagaev? "Noone's ever heard of these guys"

[GJC]

Always the same. As soon as fans of the overhyped 70ies are confronted with facts they have only answers like "**** you" or "worst post ever" or "your post is too ridiculous to even bother as everyone who understands boxing knows that Ali was the greatest".

Every opinion is allowed as long as the 70ies boxers are "sumthin special".

Muhammad = "God"
Larry Holmes = "Jesus"
Muhammad's opponents (Frazier, Foreman, Young, Liston,... ) = "Best boxers ever"

Tyson? "Overrated!"
Lennox? "OK, we grant him a place somewhere in the top30"
Klitschko? "Bum in the worst era"
Valuev? "Terrible"
Povetkin? Chagaev? "Noone's ever heard of these guys"

Always the same?
Hardly, I have wasted my time answering your point(les)s in detail. But this is like trying to convince someone who says a square is round.
Your opinions thus far is that Liston was a bum, Ali was a coward,Frazier was a "featherfist", Foreman was drugged and Ali Frazier 3 was boring.
Ok i'll answer you Tunney, you are an oxygen thief and wrong on all points and either has a distasteful agenda or is so ****** they need watering.
Happier?
They only thing that I do admire is the fact you can use so many names and can remember to keep track of what name to use to reply or make what moronic point you wish to.

[knn]

Always the same? Hardly, I have wasted my time answering your point(les)s in detail.

Really? You asked me about Shavers, I answered and you state "Call me ignorant and un-educated but I'll pass on that if I may".
Hardly an answer.

But this is like trying to convince someone who says a square is round.

I deliver FACTS, you deliver OPINIONs. You have a right to have the opinion that Ali was exciting. But to state that I think "a square is round" just because I analyze RECORDS is TYPICAL for the 70ies fans and the 2000ies haters.

Your opinions thus far is that Liston was a bum

I never ever claimed that. Because Liston is not a bum. Liston is a beater of bums. Big difference.

Ali was a coward, Frazier was a "featherfist", Foreman was drugged and Ali Frazier 3 was boring.

Ali was a coward in many of his fights. Frazier was INDEED a heavyweight featherfist (who has been put by Foreman where he objectively belongs). Thrilla in Manilla was much more than a bore: In was the proof that Ali is completely limited as he couldn't even win against a half-blind featherfist.

Just check my sig and ask yourself: WOULD ANYONE be interested in such a fight today? NO FREAKING WAY. Instead such a fight of 1 featherfist against a half-blind featherfist would be the living proof for the deep crap the heavyweight division is in.

But not in the 70ies, OH HELL NO: It was the fight of the century.

you are an oxygen thief and wrong on all points

Wrong by your opinion. Not by facts. I deliver the facts, you deliver some subjective opinion.