True or False

[MR ITALIAN]

You are only good as your last fight?

[Kevin Jesus]

Completely false.

[blind4]

false

[The Gully Gad]

False........

[MANGLER]

False and foolish.

[portuge puncher]

then ali is no better then berbick.

gimmie a break lol

[ILLuminato]

As an active fighter, yes.

As a retired fighter 20 years removed, not always. Unless you're being completely exposed like Naseem Hamed

[Spacey1991]

False... plenty of fighters have lost and came back successfully with better performances.

[STEELHEAD]

You are only good as your last fight?

of coarse not always but is a more important stat than most think.

[hollister]

I don't think that's true at all, I mean for a while after the last fight it's how many will remember a fighter but over time I don't think it would/should matter much when the overall greatness of a fighter is being considered.

Edit: I am a dumbass, i completely misunderstood the question. I initially thought it meant the last fight of one's career, now I'm thinking it means the most recent fight in a career that hasn't ended. If the latter is the way the question was meant to be understood, then it certainly goes a long way with the promoters, it means quite a bit.