Tweet
Roach has his own wayof reasoning:
He claims Mayweather struggled against DelaHoya and Pacquio beat DelaHoya better.Because of that Mayweather is the easier option and also Manny is the better fighter.
Well I beg to differ.Mosley struggled against DelaHoya so does that make Manny better than Mosley.
Benard Hopkins went up to the 9th round with DelaHoya,Manny did less and DelaHoya didnt win a single round against Manny.So it's easier for Manny to fight Benard Hopkins because Benard didnt dominate like Manny.
Floyd Mayweather fought Castillo twice and won on points.Ricky Hatton koed Castillo in 4 rounds.Hatton did better work than Mayweather right?Mayweather knocked out Hatton ....Roach doesnt see things that way.He probably thinks because Danny Williams beat Mike Tyson,Dany is therefore better than Frank Bruno because Bruno was knocked out by Tyson.
Please dont mention time and say DelaHoya had changed because Roach is like God,to him time does not exist,dont you see Freddie's twister reasoning
He claims Mayweather struggled against DelaHoya and Pacquio beat DelaHoya better.Because of that Mayweather is the easier option and also Manny is the better fighter.
Well I beg to differ.Mosley struggled against DelaHoya so does that make Manny better than Mosley.
Benard Hopkins went up to the 9th round with DelaHoya,Manny did less and DelaHoya didnt win a single round against Manny.So it's easier for Manny to fight Benard Hopkins because Benard didnt dominate like Manny.
Floyd Mayweather fought Castillo twice and won on points.Ricky Hatton koed Castillo in 4 rounds.Hatton did better work than Mayweather right?Mayweather knocked out Hatton ....Roach doesnt see things that way.He probably thinks because Danny Williams beat Mike Tyson,Dany is therefore better than Frank Bruno because Bruno was knocked out by Tyson.
Please dont mention time and say DelaHoya had changed because Roach is like God,to him time does not exist,dont you see Freddie's twister reasoning
Comment