Does Pacquiao losses matter?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jim Jeffries
    rugged individualist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 20741
    • 1,376
    • 2,868
    • 54,838

    #11
    Not really sure how losses 7 or so weight divisions and 12 + years ago matter for anything. Maybe to a guy trying to argue for a bigger share of the purse, or to a fanboy, no one else.

    Comment

    • sikwatee
      Bulad Suka Sili
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 1000
      • 137
      • 88
      • 10,088

      #12
      The KO losses of Pac don't really matter. Why? Would Floyd study those tapes in case they fight?? LOL.

      Comment

      • Jim Jeffries
        rugged individualist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2007
        • 20741
        • 1,376
        • 2,868
        • 54,838

        #13
        Originally posted by sikwate
        The KO losses of Pac don't really matter. Why? Would Floyd study those tapes in case they fight?? LOL.
        Here's hoping Floyd studies those instead of the JMM fights.

        Comment

        • STILL_DETOX
          Undisputed
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 3181
          • 201
          • 359
          • 15,204

          #14
          he may have evolved with every fight but u cant get a new chin. if he went down before, he can go down again

          Comment

          • BadNewz
            Interim Champion
            • Jun 2008
            • 889
            • 105
            • 0
            • 7,016

            #15
            The loss to Morales counts. Floyd never would have lost to a guy like that.

            Comment

            • F l i c k e r
              Il Principe
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 20727
              • 1,320
              • 858
              • 83,771

              #16
              It doesn't matter who Floyd would or wouldn't lose to. The fact is, Mayweather is boasting about Pacquiao's losses. Even though, Pacquiao was only a teenager fighting grown ass men.

              16 year old <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Adult

              Comment

              • dannyl15
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 837
                • 18
                • 0
                • 8,976

                #17
                The point Mayweather is making is that if he's been knocked out before he can be knocked out again. Mayweather has never been knocked out so therefore he is unable to be knocked out until it happens.

                Comment

                • Guest
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  • 0

                  #18
                  Originally posted by dannyl15
                  The point Mayweather is making is that if he's been knocked out before he can be knocked out again. Mayweather has never been knocked out so therefore he is unable to be knocked out until it happens.

                  Mayweather was in tax trouble before, he can be again.

                  And he could be a lot older next time.



                  Floyd was deep sea fishing bringing up a 1999 loss....

                  He coulda done better than that.

                  Comment

                  • F l i c k e r
                    Il Principe
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 20727
                    • 1,320
                    • 858
                    • 83,771

                    #19
                    Well, if we went with that rational then the Marciano-Vitali topic should have had all the votes for Marciano.

                    Because thats not true. Pacquiao isn't a 16 year old anymore. He is a 30 year old man. Which means he has done growing physically, so his chin is more than likely stronger, he is smarter, and can endure more because its not a fight between a teen in puberty vs an adult.

                    Comment

                    • Spacey1991
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 8885
                      • 247
                      • 282
                      • 18,684

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Mr.Sharapova
                      I don’t know why Mayweather keep on insisting that Pacquiao has been knockout before. Those knockouts were a long time ago. He was a young and unpolished fighter who started fighting early because his family needed the money unlike MAYWEATHER who has been trained by his father in an early age.
                      If given the opportunity to be trained by a trainer in an early age, I think he would be greater than Mayweather. Those loses he suffered wouldn’t happen. Philippines doesn’t have a great boxing program unlike in U.S.A.

                      LET ME SAY THAT MAYWEATHER IS VERY FORTUNATE!
                      Besides the loss to Eric Morales, the losses don't count... but people do think Marquez beat him.

                      Mayweather was never rich, he never had anything easy... saying that is ignorant, his dad trained him from an early age and he had Boxing rammed down his throat all his life... he trained hard and worked his balls off to get where he is today... he wasn't fortunate by any means.

                      Saying this "if given the opportunity" means nothing... that's like saying if Judah had discipline he could have been an ATG, you get what I am trying to say?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP