There really was no harm done losing to the number 1 P4P fighter, but once you lose you have to fall a bit, and what he did after the Floyd fight should not have got him in P4P consideration (I am not knocking Hatton as an opponent for Manny I just find his P4P status dubious).
Pacquiao has beaten twice the number of current top 10 p4p that Mayweather has.
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
he had just beat manny who was in the top 10 p4p.
just because he lost to raheem doesn't mean ring took him off the list.
raheem fight was at 135 so they didn't use it to bump off erik.
erik got bumped off the list after he lost to manny.Comment
-
Comment
-
For those that don't know, Eric "El Terrible" Morales was in the top 10 p4p from 1999 all the way to 2005. SEVEN YEARS STRAIGHT. Smoke on that.Comment
-
Marquez had arguably never lost a match in both matches he fought with Pacquiao. with his only losses being a questionable disqualification in his pro debut. and another questionable decision against freddy norwood when he 1st faced pacquiao.Comment
-
I knew that already and never denied that the ring rated Morales very highly going into the 2nd Pacman fight, I found that rating pretty ludacris because they did not drop Morales at all for losing to Raheem (he was like 4th still I think if he was lower in the top 10 I would have found that rating much less dubious). He was top 10 on reputation alone at that point (which is what happeans when you get on the P4P list for a long time because they do not drop you much unless you lose).Comment
Comment