Brian Kenny is a HYPOCRITE

[THE REED]

no , ****.

floyd wins might be better but pac's were more impressive.

hatton is the same hatton. oscar obviously wasn't though.

Yes Susan...

We know Floyd fought the better version of DLH no doubt... Hatton could be argued either way... Floyd was the first person to beat him... but he did it at 147... Pacman beat Hatton at 140, which was more impressive, but he also beat a worn version of Hatton, a fighter who just suffered not only his first loss but his first knockout.. and that can definitely have an effect on a fighter..

[WhoreUs]

I guess it would just depend on what you felt was more impressive?




Beating a fresher better version of Hatton/DLH but not as dominant...or beating an older more worn DLH/Hatton but in a more devastating fashion..

no , ****.

floyd wins might be better but pac's were more impressive.

hatton is the same hatton. oscar obviously wasn't though.

[xcaret]

well mayweather had a point with the marquez/pacquiao fight taking place.

[sycomantz]

is that where you got yours?





and 95% of people from Devry can probably handle an interview ALOT better than floyd can....good to see you glowing red....being unable to follow a thread should lead to red K

hes a fighter douche. he talks with this fist. Nas and Kayne west are very intelligent guys but in a one on one interview they arent articulate one bit.

i was frustrated at Kenny's dumbass questions for having the audacity to ask such ****** things.

i woul dhave lost my cool too. but i would have shut my mouth and looked at Kenny like an idiot. but everyone has their own limits of being pushed.

you have to remember. this is floyds Career and Job, hes passionate about Boxing. he takes this **** seriously and as a MAN. the **** that Kenny was doing was down right insulting. thats a fact

Kenny's questions were irrelevant to say the least b/c they had no grounds of validity.

Floyds were legit. plain and simple

[WhoreUs]

Yes Susan...

We know Floyd fought the better version of DLH no doubt... Hatton could be argued either way... Floyd was the first person to beat him... but he did it at 147... Pacman beat Hatton at 140, which was more impressive, but he also beat a worn version of Hatton, a fighter who just suffered not only his first loss but his first knockout.. and that can definitely have an effect on a fighter..

holyfield is overrated.

[sycomantz]

By keeping his hands up constantly and that circle right hook thing he does. He made himself very hard to be caught.

sorry, but a defense is tested when you have an ablebodied fighter at 100% who has the abilty and energy to actaully fight

[sycomantz]

no , ****.

floyd wins might be better but pac's were more impressive.

hatton is the same hatton. oscar obviously wasn't though.

hatton was the same hatton? the hatton who had problems with malinaggi?

the same hatton who didnt show anything he learned from May Sr? the same hatton who went in with his hands at his waist, the same hatton who suffered his first and devastating loss two years prior?

do you know what that does to a fighters confidence? alot of fighters never bounce back from their first loss

get a clue. Mannys team studied tapes of May-hatton to beat hatton.

May left the blueprint and shell of a fighter named hatton for MP to face

[THE REED]

holyfield is overrated.

You're a used Queen Latifah douche.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

BK totally destroyed FLoyd in that interview.

FLoyd contradicted himself,like 25 times.

**** was priceless.


Floyd got exposed by BK!!!!!!!!!!!

[-MAKAVELLI-]

hes a fighter douche. he talks with this fist. Nas and Kayne west are very intelligent guys but in a one on one interview they arent articulate one bit.

i was frustrated at Kenny's dumbass questions for having the audacity to ask such ****** things.

i woul dhave lost my cool too. but i would have shut my mouth and looked at Kenny like an idiot. but everyone has their own limits of being pushed.

you have to remember. this is floyds Career and Job, hes passionate about Boxing. he takes this **** seriously and as a MAN. the **** that Kenny was doing was down right insulting. thats a fact

Kenny's questions were irrelevant to say the least b/c they had no grounds of validity.

Floyds were legit. plain and simple

that's bull****



Kenney asked him valid questions and all floyd did was pursue tangents...and how were his questions irrelevant?



he asked him why he didnt wait for a PAC fight...you dont think that's relevant to what fight fans want to know?

his response was praising al haymon and ellerbee..WTF?


he asked him why he wouldn't fight shane mosely...you dont think that's relevant to what fight fans want to know?

his response was 'the dude with the 5 losses'...as if JMM was an unbeaten fighter


he asked him if Bob Arum would be an obstacle to making a fight with PAC...you dont think that's relevant to what fight fans want to know?


his response was something about not fighting for bragging rights and fighting to 'steal some more money'




the whole interview went like that dude...Brian Kenney could have conducted himself in a better manner but come the **** on....


when you are a high profile athlete and you face some heat during a presser, act like you've at least been there....you dont sit there and start questioning how much that person makes...WTF is THAT ****?!?!?




but hey, if you guys viewed it as Brian Kenney askin him why he likes peanut butter with no jelly, then that's your perspective...

he asked floyd questions that MOST fight fans want to know....he didnt lob him any softball questions and went with hard heat to the inside...as a fight fan, i can appreciate that type of journalism...no matter how sloppy Kenney went about it