Nate Cambell reminds me of e. augustus. He could beat all those 140lbers and give pac a good run too. Honestly nobody thought he would destroy the baby bull like he did. He would beat Hatton. As a matter of fact that may be the start of a great rivalry of not quite superstars.
who can nate campbell beat at 140??
Collapse
-
-
he beat juan diaz.Nate Cambell reminds me of e. augustus. He could beat all those 140lbers and give pac a good run too. Honestly nobody thought he would destroy the baby bull like he did. He would beat Hatton. As a matter of fact that may be the start of a great rivalry of not quite superstars.
he didn't destroy him.
why do people exagerrate so god damn much?Comment
-
Comment
-
Good luck to your boy Campbell...
Campbell-Funeka and Bradley-Holt looked somewhat similar to me...
The problem is, I think Bradley is probably better than Funeka, so I think he will be able to win more of the middle rounds, and idk if he is going to go down twice like he did against Holt.
Dangerous fight for Campbell, especially in his first fight at 140.Comment
-
Well, nobody can deny the fact that Nate wasnt 100% in the Funeka fight. I believe Nate at 100% would have ended that fight in 4 or 5 rounds. But thats neither here nor there. I actually think Bradley is more similar to Diaz than he is to Funeka. Make no mistake, Funeka can flat out crack, with both hands. To me Bradley is more like Diaz, a ton of volume, solid fundamentals, but not really a big hitter. And Kendall showed that maybe Bradley doesnt have the beard that Diaz has.Good luck to your boy Campbell...
Campbell-Funeka and Bradley-Holt looked somewhat similar to me...
The problem is, I think Bradley is probably better than Funeka, so I think he will be able to win more of the middle rounds, and idk if he is going to go down twice like he did against Holt.
Dangerous fight for Campbell, especially in his first fight at 140.
Of course I cant be unbiased, and I dont pretend to be, but Nate and I both love the idea of a Bradley fight, and I suspect Nate would stop him within 8 or 9.
p.s. Funeka beats all of the guys at 135. And no I'm not saying that just to make Nate look good. Funeka really got my respect in that fight. He's a badass. And dont forget, he completely smoked Raheem in 4 rounds, putting him on his ass 4 or 5 timesLast edited by OnePunch; 05-20-2009, 05:10 PM.Comment
-
-
Diaz is an inside fighter and Bradley is an outside slickster... that's the first HUGE difference. Campbell won't be able to lay on the inside and out-Diaz Bradley, because Bradley won't be there for that.Well, nobody can deny the fact that Nate wasnt 100% in the Funeka fight. I believe Nate at 100% would have ended that fight in 4 or 5 rounds. But thats neither here nor there. I actually think Bradley is more similar to Diaz than he is to Funeka. Make no mistake, Funeka can flat out crack, with both hands. Bradley is more like Diaz, a ton of volume, solid fundamentals, but not really a big hitter. And Kendall showed that maybe Bradley doesnt have the beard that Diaz has.
Of course I cant be unbiased, and I dont pretend to be, but Nate and I both love the idea of a Bradley fight, and I suspect Nate would stop him within 8 or 9.
Bradley has a terrific chin IMO... because that Holt left hook looked like it was going to end Bradley's life, and he was FINE. I have never been more shocked by someone's lack of being hurt from such a big punch.
It'll be interesting for sure.
And yes, Campbell was clearly not 100% for the Funeka fight.Comment
Comment