why people dosen't think that cotto's chin was ruined by plaster?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pullcounter
    no guts no glory
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2004
    • 42582
    • 549
    • 191
    • 49,739

    #11
    Originally posted by ACHlLLES
    User GoogleitBitch already showed you proof but you seemed to ignore it. But anyways why does anyone need proof? Wouldn't Margarito need proof that he didn't cheat against Cotto? That is what I'm talking about. Wheres his ****ing proof he didn't cheat against Cotto? Oh wait, he doesn't have any... That is what happens when you get caught with plaster before fighting your opponent, your reputation as a boxer is completely destroyed.

    Thank you come again
    all he has is some pictures and a theory. hardly convincing.

    Comment

    • ACHlLLES
      watch ur mouth
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 8398
      • 236
      • 359
      • 15,211

      #12
      Originally posted by Pullcounter
      all he has is some pictures and a theory. hardly convincing.
      Did you read the other part of my post? Margarito is the one who needs to prove he didn't cheat, but how in earth can he do that? He is the one who soiled his own reputation, so as far as most people are concerned, he probably cheated. Why on Earth would anyone give him the benefit of a doubt after getting caught about to pound Mosley in with Plaster????? Hell no **** Margarito.

      Comment

      • F l i c k e r
        Il Principe
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 20727
        • 1,320
        • 858
        • 83,771

        #13
        Originally posted by ACHlLLES
        User GoogleitBitch already showed you proof but you seemed to ignore it. But anyways why does anyone need proof? Wouldn't Margarito need proof that he didn't cheat against Cotto? That is what I'm talking about. Wheres his ****ing proof he didn't cheat against Cotto? Oh wait, he doesn't have any... That is what happens when you get caught with plaster before fighting your opponent, your reputation as a boxer is completely destroyed.

        Thank you come again
        What? When your accused of something, the Accuser must present sufficient evidence upon said matter to prove your guilty in the court of law. Therefore Margarito doesn't need to prove ****, all he has to say is "not guilty" and thats it.

        He got caught "attempting" to cheat. Not caught in the fight or after the fight with casts for gloves. Because of this we cannot say that he "did" cheat, we can only assume that this wasn't the first time he did it.

        But because we can only "assume" he is considered NOT GUILTY under court of law, until proven guilty.

        However, no one has evidence of previous fights. So fuck your Cotto statements, their all INVALID. Cotto got his fuckin ass handed to him. He chose to block with his face instead of his arms. His problem. Margarito won fair and square.

        So, god bless your incompitence for not understand basic law.

        Comment

        • ACHlLLES
          watch ur mouth
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 8398
          • 236
          • 359
          • 15,211

          #14
          Nope sorry thats not how things work in the real world, he soiled his reputation, he is a cheater. And he will be branded as one.

          Comment

          • Pullcounter
            no guts no glory
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 42582
            • 549
            • 191
            • 49,739

            #15
            Originally posted by ACHlLLES
            Did you read the other part of my post? Margarito is the one who needs to prove he didn't cheat, but how in earth can he do that? He is the one who soiled his own reputation, so as far as most people are concerned, he probably cheated. Why on Earth would anyone give him the benefit of a doubt after getting caught about to pound Mosley in with Plaster????? Hell no **** Margarito.
            burden of proof is on the accuser

            Originally posted by ACHlLLES
            Nope sorry thats not how things work in the real world, he soiled his reputation, he is a cheater. And he will be branded as one.
            sure his reputation is ruined, but that doesn't prove that he used plaster on cotto.

            Comment

            • ACHlLLES
              watch ur mouth
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 8398
              • 236
              • 359
              • 15,211

              #16
              Prove to me he didn't cheat against Cotto, why don't we just call it day since were not going to get anywheres.

              Comment

              • Pullcounter
                no guts no glory
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 42582
                • 549
                • 191
                • 49,739

                #17
                Originally posted by ACHlLLES
                Prove to me he didn't cheat against Cotto, why don't we just call it day since were not going to get anywheres.
                burden of proof is on the accuser sir.

                Comment

                • goza
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 783
                  • 11
                  • 0
                  • 920

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  all he has is some pictures and a theory. hardly convincing.
                  Originally posted by ACHlLLES
                  Did you read the other part of my post? Margarito is the one who needs to prove he didn't cheat, but how in earth can he do that? He is the one who soiled his own reputation, so as far as most people are concerned, he probably cheated. Why on Earth would anyone give him the benefit of a doubt after getting caught about to pound Mosley in with Plaster????? Hell no **** Margarito.
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  burden of proof is on the accuser


                  sure his reputation is ruined, but that doesn't prove that he used plaster on cotto.
                  Originally posted by ACHlLLES
                  Prove to me he didn't cheat against Cotto, why don't we just call it day since were not going to get anywheres.
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  burden of proof is on the accuser sir.


                  Comment

                  • goza
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 783
                    • 11
                    • 0
                    • 920

                    #19
                    anyway. i can't wait 6/13.

                    Comment

                    • cyutetrick
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 811
                      • 12
                      • 0
                      • 7,196

                      #20
                      if plaster was used by margarito margarito would have ko'd cotto in the 3rd, i think cotto just used the wrong gameplan thats why he lost.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP