It's because Pac now is a different fighter. And why are losses so emphasised on nowadays?
I thought it was how you came back from a loss that defined you as a fighter.
Sounds like more excuses to try and justify not fighting him. Funny how he bigs up Marquez, yet writes off Pacquiao and constantly tries to discredit him by bringing up fights that happened YEARS ago. Why didnt Floyd bring up the fact that Marquez got beat by Chris John?
Pacquaio started boxing to earn money so he could eat.
He didn't have a boxing family, with a father and uncle who are great boxing trainers. He didn't have his younger years filled with boxing, filled with amatuer experience and an Olympic medal.
This is what is so great about Manny - he is truly a rags to riches story. This makes me respect him more than Floyd. Capturing the Flyweight Lineal title at 20, getting knocked out twice, coming back, moving up, capturing 3 more lineal titles up to 140 in truly devasting fashion. The guy is a legend.
He really does sound like a desperate ****** when he brings up mute points like these.
It always makes me laugh when he criticises Leonard for losing to a LW(Duran) and im thinking to myself that LW would rip you a new ******* so WFT are talking about.
Floyd also thinks he belongs in the same sentence as SRR. No matter of fact he thinks he is better. However Mayweather's best win is Castillo.
Comment