Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Klitchsko terms for the Haye fight, makes them a bunch of bitches.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I doubt he'll have to.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Ishy Aytan View Post
      I mean, if Haye wins he has to fight Wladmir again and then fight Vitali.


      WTF??????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????

      So in the next 2 years he has his fighting schedule set. Within this time he wont be given the opportunity to face guys like Arreola and the other up and coming heavyweights.


      How many good years will Haye have as a Heavyweight? If he beats Wladmir, he'll be fighting them for another 2 years; 3 in total.

      He's currently 28 years old, he could hit 30 by the time he's finished fighting the Klitchsko's.


      Is it only me or dont no one else see this as an unfair terms for a fight?


      I mean, if any other fighter did it they'd be critisized right?



      What you guys think?
      since wlads been at the helm the hvwt division has been looked at by most as a circus act.
      i know theres like proffesional posters here ,tunney for example, that can
      take wlads paper tiger stats and make big of it.
      but realy... do you compare the stats of a minor league baseball player to
      one in the pro's?
      i mean iggie and carl the truth at any other time would be considered barely above a club fighter. come on.

      so yes what a ***** move wlads rematch clause is.
      to think wlad wants to prolong his clown act and tie up hayes business at hand is a revolting development!!!

      Comment


      • #33
        It is very poor really. If they were so confident, brave why would they insist on fighting the duration of 3 fights if they happened to lose a couple they'd already be heavy over dogs in?

        It's basically anti competitive behaviour imo, and dominating the division un fairly. Guy wins a fight, he wins the fight. 1 re match ok, but another one with your big brother again if you happen to win a second time, is complete madness and just stinks of someone doing anything they can to ensure they win.

        If you lose, gracefully accept it, congratulate the winner, allow the sport to progress, get a re match immediately well ok, another if you lose again v's your brother, dear dear, really lame. Haye's never gona win all 3 so our best shot at a more dynamic exciting HW division for the sport have been dashed.

        Comment


        • #34
          David knew it was the only way to get and fight with both brothers. he played dirty, insulted both of them, let them know that he wants both of them. HE got it. I'm more than sure he wouldnt pass class B fighters Povetkin, Dimitrenko, Arreola. those dudes wouldnt **** with him, because they r trying to earn title shot also, not for 1st year..

          Comment


          • #35
            The contract terms are nonsense, but I heard on an interview with Haye on Setanta Sports that before both parties re-negotiated David Haye was getting an even worse deal.

            Oh well, at least the fight has been made.

            Comment


            • #36
              It makes sense in every regard.

              Assuming neither Haye nor Wlad got seriously hurt in their fight the rematch would happen 4-6 months later. If Wlad was seriously hurt he would opt out of the rematch allowing Vitali/Haye. If Wlad wins (which I am willing to bet he will) Haye will probably fight Vitali anyway because theres nothing else out there.

              By the end of those fights the "up and comers" (I use that term loosely) will be ready to fight the current champs.

              What I would like to see is the winner of Arreolla/Minto fight the winner of Haye/Klitchskos.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by KrisSilver View Post
                It is very poor really. If they were so confident, brave why would they insist on fighting the duration of 3 fights if they happened to lose a couple they'd already be heavy over dogs in?

                It's basically anti competitive behaviour imo, and dominating the division un fairly. Guy wins a fight, he wins the fight. 1 re match ok, but another one with your big brother again if you happen to win a second time, is complete madness and just stinks of someone doing anything they can to ensure they win.

                If you lose, gracefully accept it, congratulate the winner, allow the sport to progress, get a re match immediately well ok, another if you lose again v's your brother, dear dear, really lame. Haye's never gona win all 3 so our best shot at a more dynamic exciting HW division for the sport have been dashed.
                What? if Haye wins all the fights in the contract he'll be the undisputed HW Champion in the world! How can that be bad??? Thank god this posters here are'nt managers.

                Comment


                • #38
                  this is just one of the MANY reasons why I cant stand the idea of a 2 headed champ.......these the type of contracts that get made

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Tankster View Post
                    How can it be a ***** move? Haye wants both brothers, now he's getting it. Huge paydays for him, if he doesnt want the contract then don't sign it.
                    Huge paydays? Are you kidding? He is probably making his biggest payday, but it'll hardly be huge. It's a ***** move, because I believe the one-sided nature of the deal reflects how little the Klitschko camp wanted the fight. They were bluffing, thinking Haye would walk away.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Ishy Aytan View Post
                      I mean, if Haye wins he has to fight Wladmir again and then fight Vitali.


                      WTF??????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????

                      So in the next 2 years he has his fighting schedule set. Within this time he wont be given the opportunity to face guys like Arreola and the other up and coming heavyweights.


                      How many good years will Haye have as a Heavyweight? If he beats Wladmir, he'll be fighting them for another 2 years; 3 in total.

                      He's currently 28 years old, he could hit 30 by the time he's finished fighting the Klitchsko's.


                      Is it only me or dont no one else see this as an unfair terms for a fight?


                      I mean, if any other fighter did it they'd be critisized right?




                      What you guys think?

                      They would be, but it's not like Haye worked his way up ranked contenders to earn his shot. I think he pissed them off andthey probably want to beat the **** out of him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP