Hopkins robberies.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -X-
    Kc Chiefs in 09
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2006
    • 1619
    • 150
    • 79
    • 8,464

    #11
    Originally posted by Kevin Jesus
    Taylor is my current favorite fighter, I thought Hopkins beat him the first time, the second one could have gone either way. If you like clean effective punching or if you like workrate, Judges picked work rate.

    In the Calzaghe fight I thought he did enough to pull out the win, Calzaghe had a lot in the work rate dept., but unlike Taylor, he ain't land **** on B-Hop. Calzaghe litterally fought air that night.
    I also thought Hopkins beat Calzaghe.

    Comment

    • Oasis_Lad
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2005
      • 42674
      • 2,307
      • 4,085
      • 68,065

      #12
      He lost them all fair and square.

      Comment

      • Dave Rado
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 8064
        • 266
        • 453
        • 14,460

        #13
        Originally posted by Leatherface
        Bernard Hopkins always stated that 4 of his losses were robberys,yet he only admits defeat to Legend Roy Jones Jr,some of his losses i can agree that he was robbed but what fights did ya feel Bernard Hopkins rightfully won and was robbed of the victory? And what fights did ya feel Bernard Hopkins rightfully lost and was no robbery cus he was clearly beaten?
        All four fights were very close. No close fight can ever be called a robbery. He's just a bad loser. So is anyone who can't accept that all very close fights can legitimately be scored either way, and that in those circumstances, the judges' decision is final.

        A robbery is a fight like Casamayor - Santa Cruz, which most boxing experts scored in favour of Santa Cruz by a wide margin.
        Last edited by Dave Rado; 05-16-2009, 07:42 PM.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP