Oscar vs Hatton at 147

**ThunderWolf** · 05-14-2009, 08:57 AM

No one would buy it.

**ACHlLLES** · 05-14-2009, 08:59 AM

Originally posted by ThunderWolf

No one would buy it.

Its a hypothetical question.

**strugler** · 05-14-2009, 09:01 AM

Whats the point?............they should fight a Less competetive fight.........to have a greater chance of winning.......................and make their fanbase..............more satisfied.................

**REMOVED SHARK 97** · 05-14-2009, 09:01 AM

If Oscar wins then it shows how deflated Hatton was.

**goza** · 05-14-2009, 09:01 AM

Originally posted by ACHlLLES

Its a hypothetical question.

No one would buy it.Its a answer this hypothetical question

**syphillis** · 05-14-2009, 09:07 AM

So the first guy says that Pac does not hit hard after doing a no mas. The other guy downplayed Pac winning because the first guy was a shadow of his old self, the same other guy who also didn't have the huevos to take on the first guy. So the second guy gets humiliated. Then now the first and second guy are going to fight. This is the battle of no mas vs ko. Nah, the second guy should follow the first guy in retirement.

**Maestro USA** · 05-14-2009, 09:14 AM

The Oscar that fought Forbes, throwing punches non-stop for 12 rounds without taking his foot off the gas, stops Hatton.

The Oscar that fought Pacquiao gets man-handled around the ring.

Oscar vs Hatton at 147