Was Dawson-Tarver II worth seeing?

[Pullcounter]

They showed the first fight in the UK, but not the second. I think they realised that the first was such a barn burner that they didn't screen the second to give all the other TV programmes half a chance.

But I've just read on the BBC that it was more competitive than the first. Still, I kinda don't think I give a ****.

Poor old Bad Chad, stuck in a division where the only people he can fight are the elderly or the mediocre.

almost the same fight as the first one minus the knockdown

[krispy kreme]

It was a boring in a way. Tarver did better this time, but the majority of his punches have no more steam on them, that right uppercut had Dawson hurt for a little while though. The best part of the fight was probably Tarver's wife.

[xxjace]

it was ok..fairly boring

[Butterball]

almost the same fight as the first one minus the knockdown

There was a KD in the first one? I'd forgotten that.

[ulises_solis]

You "betted"? You seem like a nice guy so I won't slash your face with a stanley knife over it, but I don't wanna see poor English like that in one of my threads again, y'hear?

sorry i meaned to say beted
i apologize once more time

[Butterball]

No, you "bet".

[-Antonio-]

I thought Chad looked worse. I figure it's only natural for a guy to struggle more in a rematch against an opponent he already beat decisevely. Either way I wouldn't waste my time watching it or judging Chad by his performance.

[Pugilistic™]

Not really.

i watched it earlier and it was pretty much the same as the first fight although it was a bit more entertaining imo.

Dawson looked better in the first fight and Tarver looked better in the second fight.

[DarchinyFAN]

If I had to attach a word to the fight, it was just average.

Not a horrible fight to watch, but I wouldnt go out of my way to find it.

[Iceta]

Hell to the no.