I was sitting only a few rows from the ring last Saturday when Ricky Hatton was knocked out stone cold by Pacman, and like the rest of us - even those who expected a Pac victory - was shocked by how devestating the beating was.
The head trainer at the boxing gym I go to said it well, I think. After the fight we were talking and he said "Ricky's a really, really, good fighter. But Manny Pacquiao's a great fighter."
I think that's the truth, but I think there's more too it.
Ricky Hatton is a come forward, tough fighter who likes to **** it out, and it's his ballsy style that has earned him what is irrefutably one of, if not the, most amazing fan base of any boxer in the history of the sport.
But, in the end, his style was never good enough to stand up to those at the top of the sport, he was never able to knock over the greats, and to many like my boxing trainer they reason that it means he himself is not a great.
I disagree. Ricky Hatton was a world champion, and was undefeated in 40+ fights against tough competition and the only losses he suffered were at the hands of the "greatest fighters on the planet". But in MY opinion, that's what does make him great. He could have picked some lesser, or washed up opponents and trounced them and retired undefeated like Calzaghe, but instead he chose to put himself in front of the toughest fighters he could have possibly faced. He's a warrior, and even after being knocked out by Mayweather he tried again, and though he failed in MY mind he will go down as a great fighter because of his spirit.
I take NOTHING away from Pacman, he is a great fighter and obviously a much better fighter than Ricky Hatton. His victory was 100% earned and I respect the hell out of him and Freddie Roach.
But Ricky put his **** on the table, he faced the best, and I think history will and SHOULD be kinder to a fighter who tried and failed then those who never put their ass on the line. (*cough CALZAGHE*cough)
The head trainer at the boxing gym I go to said it well, I think. After the fight we were talking and he said "Ricky's a really, really, good fighter. But Manny Pacquiao's a great fighter."
I think that's the truth, but I think there's more too it.
Ricky Hatton is a come forward, tough fighter who likes to **** it out, and it's his ballsy style that has earned him what is irrefutably one of, if not the, most amazing fan base of any boxer in the history of the sport.
But, in the end, his style was never good enough to stand up to those at the top of the sport, he was never able to knock over the greats, and to many like my boxing trainer they reason that it means he himself is not a great.
I disagree. Ricky Hatton was a world champion, and was undefeated in 40+ fights against tough competition and the only losses he suffered were at the hands of the "greatest fighters on the planet". But in MY opinion, that's what does make him great. He could have picked some lesser, or washed up opponents and trounced them and retired undefeated like Calzaghe, but instead he chose to put himself in front of the toughest fighters he could have possibly faced. He's a warrior, and even after being knocked out by Mayweather he tried again, and though he failed in MY mind he will go down as a great fighter because of his spirit.
I take NOTHING away from Pacman, he is a great fighter and obviously a much better fighter than Ricky Hatton. His victory was 100% earned and I respect the hell out of him and Freddie Roach.
But Ricky put his **** on the table, he faced the best, and I think history will and SHOULD be kinder to a fighter who tried and failed then those who never put their ass on the line. (*cough CALZAGHE*cough)
Comment