Should fighters get credit for beating already beaten fighters?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sandyvahra
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2004
    • 1451
    • 48
    • 0
    • 7,732

    #11
    History tells us the true greats have bounced back from defeat. So yes.

    Comment

    • Zarco
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 4760
      • 184
      • 133
      • 12,032

      #12
      Originally posted by Pullcounter
      c'mon man everybody loses sometime to someone what a ****** question
      what? you are one the posters i was referring to.

      your posts in other threads:

      Originally posted by Pullcounter
      casamayor was semi-shot and diaz already lost to campbell though.
      Originally posted by Pullcounter
      cause casamayor is shot and juan diaz was ruined by campbell

      Comment

      • MANGLER
        Sex Tape Flop Artist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 30142
        • 1,705
        • 2,355
        • 46,598

        #13
        Difference between bein beaten before and bein shot or some **** like that. Simply havin losses don't discredit a fighter.

        Comment

        • F l i c k e r
          Il Principe
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 20727
          • 1,320
          • 858
          • 83,771

          #14
          Wth? If fighters dont get credit for beating already beaten fighters then no one is the best. Unless you beat Calzaghe, Froch, or Mayweather.

          Comment

          • AKATheMack
            Unreasonably Logical
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 11155
            • 430
            • 285
            • 19,179

            #15
            I catch the sarcasm, but Juan Diaz was outclassed by Campbell. If you're supposed to be top-level you should perform at top-level. I was rooting for Diaz, but it didnt take long to figure out he was outgunned.

            Comment

            • Guest
              • 0
              • 0
              • 0

              #16
              Originally posted by F l i c k e r
              Wth? If fighters dont get credit for beating already beaten fighters then no one is the best. Unless you beat Calzaghe, Froch, or Mayweather.

              Or they can credit for fighters that are 25-0 and suck and have never fought anyone or fight harder fights with guys that are 35-5 and have been in there with the elite and won some.


              When somebody is already shot and most people know, credit shouldn't be given. Like Mitchell versus Paul Williams and **** like that.

              Comment

              • King Koopa
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2007
                • 1790
                • 38
                • 34
                • 1,990

                #17
                Depends on when and how they lost

                Does the fighter still recieve credit? Of course, but how much depends on again, how many fights ago and how their opponent lost.

                Comment

                • Spacey1991
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 8885
                  • 247
                  • 282
                  • 18,684

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Zarco
                  I lost count on how many posters ive seen belittling Juan Manuel Marquez's win over Juan Diaz by stating that Nate Campbell had already beaten him. I never really knew this. Apparently everyone should take a look at their favorite fighters resume and every win better be against an undefeated fighter, or you need to reevaluate who you give credit to.
                  Most fighters have had a few losses, so if that was the case then no win would get credit... so of course a fighter should get credit for beating a fighter that has already lost. Unless that loss really did something to them...

                  Comment

                  • larry x
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 10715
                    • 499
                    • 247
                    • 11,556

                    #19
                    in that case you have to fight all undefeated fighters

                    Comment

                    • Thread Stealer
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Sep 2007
                      • 9657
                      • 439
                      • 102
                      • 17,804

                      #20
                      Of course, unless the "already beaten" fighter is a shell of himself.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP