Which might make sense if you look at it from a certain perspective, but look at it like this; if Pacquiao fights Mayweather his OWN earning potential increases. If he were to fight Edwin Valero or Humberto Soto he could get 90% of the money and it wouldn't be half of what even 55% of the money against Mayweather is.
So, if you're Mayweather, why should you agree to a deal that's about as bad as it could possibly be for you? If Arum says Pacquiao gets 65% or no deal then fighters who could potentially get a better deal down the line will wait until a better deal is available. That's fu(kin' ******ed because, in effect, by being so greedy and basically demanding every last cent Arum is killing negotiations before they even start.
So, if you're Mayweather, why should you agree to a deal that's about as bad as it could possibly be for you? If Arum says Pacquiao gets 65% or no deal then fighters who could potentially get a better deal down the line will wait until a better deal is available. That's fu(kin' ******ed because, in effect, by being so greedy and basically demanding every last cent Arum is killing negotiations before they even start.
Comment