Who do you consider a better fighter Hatton or Froch?

[ACHlLLES]

I think Hatton is the better fighter, so I find it hilarious as **** froch is trying to give him advice about retiring now.

[toysale]

Hatton's the better fighter, it won't be too long until Froch gets taught a lesson by somebody. But don't get me wrong, I respect Froch as a boxer but hate him as a person. My gut feeling is that when he does get knocked out, he might shut up about a fight with Calzaghe. Optimistic thinking I know...

At the moment though, Hatton's definately the better boxer but you can't really compare them at this moment in time.

[The Hammer]

Hatton is shot now, but he was the better fighter in his day.

[ButlerBoxing]

hatton has been beaten by arguably the two of the best boxers of his generation, no shame in that, he is by far the better boxer. froch has beaten taylor who he was fortunate to win against anyway

[T-97]

Hatton is shot now, but he was the better fighter in his day.

I wouldn't say he's shot, although if he continues to fight he will be haunted by that humiliating loss. But he's past his best for sure. If you look at the twos last few fights,

Froch TKO'd Taylor in 12, won a UD over Pascal, and TKO'd Robin Reid in 5 (I think) a while back.

Hatton was stopped early by Pac, TKO'd Malignaggi, UD over Lazcano and was stopped by Mayweather.

So, although Hatton has fought the better opposition, it's up for debate who is better at this point IMO.

[mathed]

hatton has been beaten by arguably the two of the best boxers of his generation, no shame in that, he is by far the better boxer. froch has beaten taylor who he was fortunate to win against anyway

I agree here!