Losing 2 out of almost 50 fights against arguably the 2 best boxers in the world

**AssasinKing** · 05-03-2009, 02:49 PM

lol i was thinking same....funny how people change their minds so quickly without thinking

**ИATAS** · 05-03-2009, 02:50 PM

yeah you gotta give a ton of respect to hatton for fighting the best in the first place. Sure he came up short, but it's mayweather & pacman after all, two ATG's.

**oojaksoo** · 05-03-2009, 02:51 PM

Originally posted by ИATAS206

yeah you gotta give a ton of respect to hatton for fighting the best in the first place. Sure he came up short, but it's mayweather & pacman after all, two ATG's.

Preety much what I would of posted.

**Bhopreign** · 05-03-2009, 02:53 PM

Originally posted by -X-

Means that you're a ****ty boxer.

Correct?

Its not that he lost to the best but how he lost, he looked amateurish coming in with hands down face first straight in. Disgusting.

**Bhopreign** · 05-03-2009, 02:54 PM

Originally posted by ИATAS206

yeah you gotta give a ton of respect to hatton for fighting the best in the first place. Sure he came up short, but it's mayweather & pacman after all, two ATG's.

Easy to fight the best when youre getting 10+ million, sign me up.

**Kobe Bryant** · 05-03-2009, 02:55 PM

Its about who you beat. Tye Fields had a good record before he was killed by Barret.

**SHB** · 05-03-2009, 02:59 PM

Depends who the 50 are against really.

I love Ricky to bits but when he's fought a top P4P fighter he's come up short. Just the way it is. He's had a cracking career either way.

**FreshPrince** · 05-03-2009, 02:59 PM

Beating no good prime competition makes you good?

**Pullcounter** · 05-03-2009, 03:10 PM

Originally posted by -X-

Means that you're a ****ty boxer.

Correct?

I don't get why its so shameful to lose to the 2 best fighters of this era.

Losing 2 out of almost 50 fights against arguably the 2 best boxers in the world