Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

You guys are hilarious...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by TheGreatHeron View Post
    Why does it matter? You seem to be ready to make judgments because of his ethnicity.

    What are you?

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Precision View Post
      Its funny how Hatton is all of a sudden a bum

      Hatton was the best at 140 and ruled the division for years and years.

      Pacquiao ended his night in 2 rounds. That deserves credit.
      He was dubbed Overrated when Floyd beat him

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Little Killer View Post
        Wtf are people tripping one. James Toney is better than Barrera and JMM maybe not Morales

        Hopkins is greater than anyone on Pac Resume

        Hopkins is overrated, period.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by The_Executioner View Post
          A rematch with B-Hop shudda happened but you can blame both guys for that. And he dominated Toney...

          What a ****ty argument. Can't blame the fighters? Are youa ***ing crackhead?

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by The_Executioner View Post
            James Toney was a beast in his prime idk what ya'll talkin about. And I don't even have to speak for Bernard...


            Funny, because before the Pavlik fight, Hopkins wasn't considered SO GREAT. After a unspectacular win (impressive, but unspectacular) suddenly you got these nutlickers like yourself talking like he's ATG top 10. ***ing joke...

            Comment


            • #96
              Why didn't Hatton fight Cotto, Mayweather, Gatti, Whitter, or Torres @140?

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by The_Executioner View Post
                I strongly disagree. Pac gets too much credit for 2 high quality wins. He edged Marquez, beat a weight drained DLH, a decent fighter in Hatton. Roy knocked out and made a fool out of just about every1 he fought during his reign.


                Roy was so impressive because he fought so many B and C level fighters. That's like Pacquiao fighting David Diaz level fighters. Guess what earlier in this career Pac KTFO all his easier competition too. You just didn't see it because he was doing it overseas.

                BTW boxing resume aren't judged by how you come up the ladder. Its judged by what you do when you're up there. And Roy fell off the ladder while Pac kept climbing.
                Last edited by Pacmanjay; 05-03-2009, 01:40 PM.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by The_Executioner View Post
                  Just for samples who here would you put Pac ahead of?
                  20. George Foreman
                  21. Tony Canzoneri
                  22. Barney Ross
                  23. Jimmy McLarnin
                  24. Julio Cesar Chavez
                  25. Marcel Cerdan
                  26. Joe Frazier
                  27. Ezzard Charles
                  28. Jake LaMotta
                  29. Sandy Saddler
                  30. Terry McGovern

                  Maybe Chavez with his padded record...some don't like ESPN's list but I don't see how Manny hits the top 30. Pacquiao deserves love but he's gettin too much rite now.

                  Things should cool down in a day or two...
                  Why is Jake Lamotta better? Because he went 1-5 against Ray Robinson? And when he won, he weighed in as a Middleweight, while Sugar was a Welterweight.

                  Fraizer won the biggest fight of all time. I give him loads of credit for that, but again one big win in a glorified era shouldn't be enough to make him so much better than everyone else.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP