They are similar size and strength, but I don't think Hatton could've done to DLH what Pac did.
Pacman vs Hitman Tale of the Tape... Interesting
Collapse
-
I'm sorry are you really that ******? The pics where the angles aren't distorted, they look pretty much the same size.
Teh pics that you posted, the angles are clearly made to look Hatton bigger.
I'm sorry, are you ***ing ******ed?Comment
-
What about this one??

Ricky is obviously bigger.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
ricky is the bigger guy...but that doesnt mean he will win the fight...
anybody that says they are the same size or pac has the advantage in overall mass.....is just on another planet or something.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Eh......? Have you seen Toney at HW? Even against the tiny HW Holyfield, he looked like a damn fat, midget-dwarf. He has never looked like he belonged at HW. He looks like a natural 160, 168 pound fighter. That is what best suits his frame. His frame doesn't take the HW limits that he needs to beat other guys. At HW he literally looks like a little guy that has stacked on mass amount of fat because he's lazy.
What about one of the greatest weight jumpers of all, Roberto Duran? He most certainly didn't have the frame to compete properly at the higher weights. He was also a natural 135 pound fighter and not even a big one at that. He was often out-sized in the majority of his LW title fights and when he was at WW, someone like Leonard was man many inches taller and had a freakish reach advantage as well. Are you going to say he had the frame to compete at SMW where he ended up? He had a 130, 135 pound body. He didn't belong any higher and only due to his immense skill was he able to compete at such high weights.
The only he ever got to those weights though was because he was undisciplined and lazy. He could not be bothered to keep in shape, hence him putting on huge amounts of fat. It had nothing to do with 'frame'.
These guys are just fat bastards.Last edited by BennyST; 04-30-2009, 07:36 AM.Comment






Comment