Originally posted by trainhard_187
View Post
And why do you keep bringing up the Lazcano fight, when Hatton was so far below his normal standards in that fight that he immediately sacked Graham and teamed up with Floyd Snr as a direct result of that performance - yet despite that, he still won 10 out of 12 rounds? He was above his normal standards in his next fight. And although feather-fisted, Malignaggi was The Ring's #1 contender, and most people predicted that he would out-box Hatton, at least in the early rounds, instead of which he was dominated for every minute of every round.
And under the rules of boxing, the person who wins a fight is the person who the judges score the fight to, not the person who trainhard scores it to. You may disagree with the judges, but that's just your opinion. The fact is that Collazo lost to Hatton - look it up on boxrec if you don't believe me. And although controversial, the fight was very close, and no very close fight can ever be called a robbery; and a lot of boxing experts scored it narrowly to Hatton. If Hatton "lost" that fight then Pac "lost" both his fights with JMM.
Plus Hatton was fighting Collazo outside his peak weight division, where his power and speed are not as good as they are at 140; whereas he'll be fighting Pac at his peak weight class of Jnr Welterweight.
You also didn't mention that he completely dominated Urango and Maussa.
It's one thing for you to say that you think Hatton will lose, but the completely irrational and bitter-sounding way you trash his record is getting old.
Comment