Taylor might not have won, even w/o the KO

**BmoreBrawler** · 04-27-2009, 05:59 AM

I thought 2 judges had Taylor ahead, thats why they were saying Froch needed to come from behind. Maybe you have the press row scores.

**PrettyBoy22** · 04-27-2009, 05:59 AM

If thats true about the judges scorecards ( i haven't seen it ) then your right, Froch would of probably nicked it by SD.

We'll never know though will we. It doesn't really matter now, the right guy won the fight

**Dubious-Dutch** · 04-27-2009, 06:02 AM

Originally posted by Underdog82

Why do people keep saying he would have won had he not been knocked out?

It's utter bullshlt

By round 11 they posted what the judges had scored already.

105-103 Taylor
105-104 Froch
104-104

Froch clearly won the last round, even if he didn't get the KO.

How do you figure Taylor would have won?

Is it just your opinion and thats it? Because if thats the case, you don't have an argument. Thats why they let judges score fights. Not random fans who hold incredible biases and just give points to their boy because they feel he looked better at certain points.

It could have easily been a draw or with Froch winning a SP.

Those were the press row scores not the official judges. I had Taylor winning the first six with the knockdown. Taylor looked better for the majority of the fight not just certain points. You seem to be the one with a bias not these so called posters.

**Underdog82** · 04-27-2009, 06:05 AM

Ok, you are correct. I am mistaken. It was the press score cards.

However, it was very close regardless and I believe that even without the KO, the fight was close enough to have gone either way.

**Dubious-Dutch** · 04-27-2009, 06:08 AM

Originally posted by Underdog82

Ok, you are correct. I am mistaken. It was the press score cards.

However, it was very close regardless and I believe that even without the KO, the fight was close enough to have gone either way.

It was a close fight, I agree. A split decision would of been controversial anyways. At least a knockout was conclusive.

**Underdog82** · 04-27-2009, 06:08 AM

Originally posted by DeafCon

Those were the press row scores not the official judges. I had Taylor winning the first six with the knockdown. Taylor looked better for the majority of the fight not just certain points. You seem to be the one with a bias not these so called posters.

So called... lol, there are no shortage of threads in the last 5 pages ranting about how Taylor would of won.

**TheGreatA** · 04-27-2009, 06:10 AM

Froch would have had to win the last round 10-6 to get a draw.

Two judges had Taylor ahead 106-102, one had it for Froch by the same margin.

**Dubious-Dutch** · 04-27-2009, 06:11 AM

Originally posted by Underdog82

So called... lol, there are no shortage of threads in the last 5 pages ranting about how Taylor would of won.

He could of won, but that doesn't matter as Taylor was koed. The same nonsense was said after Pavlik knocked out Taylor the first time.

**Kball15** · 04-27-2009, 06:24 AM

Originally posted by Underdog82

Ok, you are correct. I am mistaken. It was the press score cards.

However, it was very close regardless and I believe that even without the KO, the fight was close enough to have gone either way.

It was close but Factually, the scorecards would have had Taylor winning a split decision if he survived round 12

Taylor might not have won, even w/o the KO