Boxrec has froch p4p number 4 LOL

[NakiFan]

and SMW number 1!

[Chunk..]

Boxrec use math, not peoples opinions.

[street bully]

Nah he is no P4P fighter, he may be around the mid 20s but he is in no way in the top 10, and Bute and Kessler have somthing to say about him being SMW # 1.

[larry x]

computerized system

[Ryn0]

computerized system

Yep, it's got no credibility.

[alza1988]

He's still 6 in the ring rankings smw . Taylor's 5 they might still change

http://www.ringtv.com/ratings/super_middleweight/

[The Hammer]

Nah he is no P4P fighter, he may be around the mid 20s but he is in no way in the top 10, and Bute and Kessler have somthing to say about him being SMW # 1.

Should be:

#1 Kessler
#2 Bute

Froch would have trouble against several other fighters at 168, namely Andrade, Bika, Inkin, Balzsay and Dirrell.

[The_Visitation]

He has as good claim as any for SMW #1. Kessler is probably the best fighter of the bunch but really has done bugger all to prove it in the way of results. Hopefully fights against Kessler, Bute etc will happen so we can really see who belongs where.

p4p is a nonsense, though, obviously, but as has been said the boxrec version doesn't mean anything.

[The Hammer]

He's still 6 in the ring rankings smw . Taylor's 5 they might still change
http://www.ringtv.com/ratings/super_middleweight/

The Ring rankings don't get updated until Monday afternoon or Tuesday.

[-----------]

and SMW number 1!

He's P4P Number 19.

Can you not read?

http://www.boxrec.com/index.php