ur crazy if you think sweat-pea wouldve beat mayweather!!!

[roujinziro]

Whitaker would have beat Mayweather, maybe not easily but I think it would have been decisive.

[Dynamite Kid]

first off, mike tyson was much older than the pernell im talking about, had a three year layoff and aferwards lost his trainer, was on drug and mental medicines, had no steady trainer, was fat, and had no will to fight..... if pernell had a combination of problems of that magnitude, than you would have an arguement......

Mike lost to Douglas to and Holy and Lewis 2x. What are excuses for those losses.

[Fox McCloud]

I mean... I guess you should try watching a Pernell Whitaker fight when he is in his prime and not shoving bricks of snow up his nose...

Whitaker was old, past his prime and doing ******* daily at the point of the Hurtado fight.

I'm not saying who would win one way or another... because neither showed much flaw in their primes, but... your logic on why Mayweather wins is ****ing awful.

[a-raines21]

pyror was a welterweight when he retired, whitaker was a lightweight.

ur right, i forgot how long ago pryor retired. the others still stand, and he didnt fight hector camach either

[T-97]

Yes, I was undefeated on a Boxing Forum, wait... what?

I'll enlighten you to this extent. Whittaker was not in his prime in the fights you have seen, before you claim age and all that ****e, consider that not everyone ages in the same way, you have to take into account a lot of factors, genes, lifestyle, punishment taken etc. Whittaker did coke, which really didn't help him. Go and watch his schooling of undefeated Julio Cesar Chavez, possibly the greatest Mexican fighter of all time, and compare it with Mayweather victories over Jose Luis Castillo, to see how the 2 compare in similar match ups. Before, you say "Oh but Whittaker only got a draw", watch the fight, anyone with 2 eyes knows Whittaker won that fight.

No? Nothing?

[Don Johnson]

those arent my quotes ****tard! and let me explain something to you, and anyone else who usually misinterpret my posts...
antonio margarito is a bum- im sure many will agree

shane mosley hits harder than felix trinidad- i said this because it was my understanding that tito used plaster

james kirkland kos paul williams- this is very possible, as we have not seen williams hit by someone with kirklands power

floyd mayweather kos shane mosley- i didnt say this, i said he would beat mosley. however,sorces tell me that shane is losing it mentally, so this is not very possible

zab judah is more skilled than juan manuel marquez- he was, not is.... at 140, zab had num 1 p4p potential

zab judah would beat shane mosley today- never said that..... i was talkin about last may

carlos quintana is not a good fighter- he isnt imo

pernell whitaker is not in the same class as floyd mayweather- u read my post and tell me if these words were in it!

bro please b4 you make yourself look any worse just shut the hell up please. Your posts are so dumb and meaningless.

[a-raines21]

Mike lost to Douglas to and Holy and Lewis 2x. What are excuses for those losses.

nike ****ed up, and didnt do what he was suppose to. he still had the ability to beat anyone. there is no excuse

[a-raines21]

u another nutthugger so stop it your boy cherry picks bottom line!!! By the way pryor was on his way out,terry norris was in a class above him,and Meldrick was washed up after the Chavez fight so what u sayin????

lol.... you say something wrong, and change subject when corrected.

[Dynamite Kid]

No? Nothing?

Exactly!!

Whitaker would of white washed Castillo fcukin easily, and i mean easily. He was JCC sparring partner and Mayweather only just managed to get by him. He had to virtually run in the second fight to get the victory.

[Mr. Ryan]

floyd mayweather was caught off balance against judah, which would have happened if he fought a coventional fighter. being southpaw had nothing to do with it. Pernell whitaker, imo, wouldnt have been able to deal with mayweathers mixture of speed, power, accuracy, and skill, while breaking through his defense as well. since mayweather is a total package, he takes this fight. and you forgot to mention sharmba mitch, who is a southpaw that mayweather destroyed as well. another thing i wanted to mention is that pernell squared his sholders alot, which takes away from the southpaw advantage, and makes him easier to hit. and to answer your question, ive seen the oscar fight, which couldve went either way, but thats it. i cant find hq whitiker fights, therefore i dont watch them.

So we're holding Whitaker's loss of balance against him, but not Mayweather's?

Mayweather got caught with about as clean a right hook as you can get from a southpaw.

Sharmba Mitchell, whom Mayweather destroyed, had just been destroyed by Tszyu the year before.

You've only seen two fights from Whitaker, both well past his prime. So how can you be so sure that Whitaker couldn't possibly beat Mayweather? Doesn't even make sense in the logic.