Manny Pacquiao Avoids Black Fighters, Says Jackson
Collapse
-
it's still funny how the pacman fans still swallow this sh-it about manny being number one,marquez beat him twice,mostly all of media and some in phillipines say that,even nonito donaire thought he lost,last night brian kenny and dan rafael said he thought marquez won both fights,,,you guys are delusionalComment
-
no offense to Jackson.
But i don't remember any black fighters in the lower weight classes that were his level or even close.
Nate Campbell has come to mind but that's RECENT but other than that, he's kind of wrong..
Guess he forgot Pac fought a 106-135 lately and not the upper divisions where black fighters are dominatingComment
-
immortality
nobody in boxing history have done what manny can do - when he captures another hardware at 147.....oscar, floyd and even armstrong will be eclipsed
but he needs to hurdle ricky first...which is "very doable"Comment
-
it's still funny how the pacman fans still swallow this sh-it about manny being number one,marquez beat him twice,mostly all of media and some in phillipines say that,even nonito donaire thought he lost,last night brian kenny and dan rafael said he thought marquez won both fights,,,you guys are delusionalComment
-
it's still funny how the pacman fans still swallow this sh-it about manny being number one,marquez beat him twice,mostly all of media and some in phillipines say that,even nonito donaire thought he lost,last night brian kenny and dan rafael said he thought marquez won both fights,,,you guys are delusional
Dont get me wrong, Marquez is good but his name has seriously been riding high off the close fights with Pacquiao. Without Pacquiao then what. Atleast if you take Marquez's name out of Pacs resume, Pac still has two dominate wins over MAB and Morales. Marquez just one win over MAB.Comment
-
I'm sure Jackson is just speaking out of frustration as someone who cares about the sport. Maybe Pacquiao didn't duck in the past, maybe he did, but there are two facts here that are undeniable.
1. Pacquiao would be destroyed by Floyd Mayweather or Paul Williams. He would also probably lose to Nate Campbell or Timothy Bradley.
2. Pacquiao's "achievements" from the lower weight classes are drastically overblown. Joe Calzaghe dominated 168 for ten years, the Klitschkos are dominating heavyweight, but everyone recognizes that those things are meaningless.Comment
-
I'm sure Jackson is just speaking out of frustration as someone who cares about the sport. Maybe Pacquiao didn't duck in the past, maybe he did, but there are two facts here that are undeniable.
1. Pacquiao would be destroyed by Floyd Mayweather or Paul Williams. He would also probably lose to Nate Campbell or Timothy Bradley.
2. Pacquiao's "achievements" from the lower weight classes are drastically overblown. Joe Calzaghe dominated 168 for ten years, the Klitschkos are dominating heavyweight, but everyone recognizes that those things are meaningless.
2. Pacquiaos acheivements are far better then Joe C. whos throughout his carreer his wins were all over seas. Atleast Pac fought the best in his division here in the U.S. rather then Calzaghe who finally came to the U.S. and took advantage of a spent RJJ.Comment
Comment