Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ricky Hatton Massive Interview Transcript on Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Dave Rado View Post
    Pacquiao hasn't really proved himself above 130, so in that sense Ricky's right. We won't know how well he can take the punches of a legitimate Jnr Welterweight until after the fight; and nor will we know if he has enough power at that weight to knock out an elite fighter who's more or less in his prime until after the fight.

    But still, he's at the least a natural Lightweight now, and possibly a natural Jnr Welterweight. The weight he had when he started at is irrelevant, especially as he turned pro when he was only 15.
    im not denying the fact that ricky is bigger.i was responding to what alcoholic said ,him being sick about people saying pac is so small.go back and you'll see what im talking about !

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Al Coholic View Post
      He means weight, i thought most boxing fans would realise that.
      isn't that what makes divisions?...then you said pac is bigger than ricky...

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by boxing2106 View Post
        pacquiao is not one dimensional and pacquiao will be lightening fast by the time the fight comes and pacquiao is the one who ajusts to you not you to him.. and hatton just talked mad **** buts its ight weel see on may 2nd
        Originally posted by boxing2106 View Post
        pacquiao is not one dimensional
        Yes he is, he alway keeps he never switches from his aggressive style.
        Never have I seen him fight and wait on his opponent. So in fact yes he is one dimensional, not that it is a bad thing.

        Originally posted by boxing2106 View Post
        pacquiao will be lightening fast by the time the fight comes
        you're right on that one

        Originally posted by boxing2106 View Post
        pacquiao is the one who ajusts to you not you to him
        Doubt it, during the Marquez fights he kept using the same technique, nothing changed.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by baracuda View Post
          isn't that what makes divisions?...then you said pac is bigger than ricky...
          I didn't say Pac was bigger tha Ricky, i said he's bigger in most measurements but Hatton weighs about 5lb more than him on fight night. Which isn't such a massive difference.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by DUnknown1 View Post
            Yes he is, he alway keeps he never switches from his aggressive style.
            Never have I seen him fight and wait on his opponent. So in fact yes he is one dimensional, not that it is a bad thing.


            you're right on that one


            Doubt it, during the Marquez fights he kept using the same technique, nothing changed.
            but did it work?...who officially won?...

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by baracuda View Post
              but did it work?...who officially won?...
              You are still missing the point , if it worked or not, Pac did not change his style, therefore Pac is one-dimensional. And like I said before there is nothing wrong with that, but call it like it is.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Al Coholic View Post
                I didn't say Pac was bigger tha Ricky, i said he's bigger in most measurements but Hatton weighs about 5lb more than him on fight night. Which isn't such a massive difference.
                you said pac's bigger in most of the measurements,do you deny sayin this?i don't think you would..

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by DUnknown1 View Post
                  You are still missing the point , if it worked or not, Pac did not change his style, therefore Pac is one-dimensional. And like I said before there is nothing wrong with that, but call it like it is.
                  you're missin my point as well!let me simplify it for you:would you fix something thats not broke?...

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by baracuda View Post
                    you said pac's bigger in most of the measurements,do you deny sayin this?i don't think you would..
                    That's what i just said in the post you quoted
                    Pacquiao is bigger in measurements and Hatton is heavier, i never stated that Pac was bigger than Hatton.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by baracuda View Post
                      im not denying the fact that ricky is bigger.i was responding to what alcoholic said ,him being sick about people saying pac is so small.go back and you'll see what im talking about !
                      But what he said about the fact he started at Flyweight being irrelevant is perfectly true, it is irrelevant. That was my point. I don't think you can have read my previous post properly. Pac is either a natural Jnr Welterweight or a natural Lightweight now, and we'll find out which on fight night.

                      If Pac is now a natural Lightweight, then he's only slightly smaller than Hatton; and if he's now a natural Jnr Welterweight, then he isn't any smaller than Hatton. We won't know which he is until fight night, though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP