pacquiao only has 1 signature win

[Fulcrum29]

WTF what's with the hate for pac
He fought the best of his generation.
He started his career at 106, he work his way up to the top
and now he's fighting the top dogs at 140 then 147
thats about 10 division

don't get ahead of yourself there little boy, Manny's only a 4 division champ.

[Guest]

So what if Pac didn't fight the best in most divisions he fought in.

That's plainly obvious.

But it was a money thing, and he gets mad props from me for fighting JMM twice..

[Steak]

That was Erik's first fight at 135 and he looked fat.
Raheem was a live opponent and before the fight, many fans and expert saw it as a competitive bout and an upset situation.
Morales symply lose to a bigger,slick boxer with a speed and skill that can befuddle many opponent.

Raheem got robbed against Juarez. it was a hometown decision.
Raheem lose a split against Freaitas. That wasn't a fight. It was a two men humping and hugging each other all night.
Raheem got Koe'd by Funeka late in his career. Funeka isn't a bum.

please, dont try to make Raheem look good. Im not saying hes a bad fighter, but the guy has very little power, and is so defensive he literally barely outlandeds bums in his fights.

hes no bum, but Morales should not have lost to him. It was named Upset of the Year for a good reason. the fact that Morales only won a handful of rounds against him as well is pretty bad.

Pacquiao should get credit for his wins over Morales...Morales was still a top fighter at 130lbs and even 135lbs...but he shouldnt get credit for beating a 'prime' Morales, because Morales was a few notches down from what he once was. I dont give Pacquiao much more credit for his wins over Morales than I give him for his win over David Diaz.

[Guest]

please, dont try to make Raheem look good. Im not saying hes a bad fighter, but the guy has very little power, and is so defensive he literally barely outlandeds bums in his fights.

hes no bum, but Morales should not have lost to him. It was named Upset of the Year for a good reason. the fact that Morales only won a handful of rounds against him as well is pretty bad.

Pacquiao should get credit for his wins over Morales...Morales was still a top fighter at 130lbs and even 135lbs...but he shouldnt get credit for beating a 'prime' Morales, because Morales was a few notches down from what he once was. I dont give Pacquiao much more credit for his wins over Morales than I give him for his win over David Diaz.

I give Pac credit for cashing in. Morales 3 should have never happened.
Barrera 2 shouldn't have either.

But he would've been dumb not to take those fights. Those were the most money against anybody he was gonna get.

[Steak]

I give Pac credit for cashing in. Morales 3 should have never happened.
Barrera 2 shouldn't have either.

But he would've been dumb not to take those fights. Those were the most money against anybody he was gonna get.

why not? they were 1 and 1. the 3rd Morales fight should have happened, although it was fairly clear as to who the winner was going to be.

and I dont blame him for fighting Barrera either. Barrera was coming off a slightly controversial loss to Marquez, and a big winning streak before that. he was still a very good fighter.

besides, sometimes you have to cash in against the big names if you want to fight the real challenges in the division. those top guys need a reason to fight you.

[Guest]

why not? they were 1 and 1. the 3rd Morales fight should have happened, although it was fairly clear as to who the winner was going to be.

and I dont blame him for fighting Barrera either. Barrera was coming off a slightly controversial loss to Marquez, and a big winning streak before that. he was still a very good fighter.

besides, sometimes you have to cash in against the big names if you want to fight the real challenges in the division. those top guys need a reason to fight you.

JMM was his best fight. He skipped over everyone else worth a **** at 122,126,130,135.

I give him props though for making the most he could.

That's the idea and I don't condemn him for that.

[Guest]

last i checked..he beat jmm

He sure didn't look like he won the second one.

I think those two are 1-1 and need a third battle to settle the score.

[2-smooth]

Floyd v DLH = Spinks v Ali.

Floyd v Castillo I = Holyfield v Lewis I

Floyd v Baldomir = Tyson v Stewart

castillo please

floyd beat castillo clearly only the haters think he lost

stewart was linear champ like baldomir?

[cuzfozzy]

better than none

[2-smooth]

better than none

gatti
corrales
castillo
baldomir

??????