Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More info about Clottey and the IBF Title

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More info about Clottey and the IBF Title

    http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box.../boxingapril17

    • The Miguel Cotto-Joshua Clottey bout June 13 (HBO) was intended to unify alphabet welterweight belts but won't. Although Cotto will defend his WBO version of the 147-pound title he won in February, Clottey was forced to relinquish the IBF version. Although Clottey signed his contract in time to meet the IBF's deadline to approve the unification bout, Cotto didn't meet it because he didn't sign his contract until this week. The handlers of South African mandatory challenger Isaac Hlatshwayo then pressured the IBF to force Clottey to either negotiate with them or vacate. Since the Cotto fight is way bigger than one with Hlatshwayo, Clottey sent a letter to the IBF giving up the title. "As you know, I asked for the opportunity to unify the titles with Miguel Cotto. I met all IBF deadlines; Cotto did not," Clottey wrote. He went on to write, "Despite the fact that Cotto missed his deadlines, I made mine and I ask you to reconsider and allow the unification bout to take place. I ask that I not be penalized for someone else's missed deadline. … If the IBF cannot see its way free to grant my request I must, with great sadness, relinquish my title. The financial benefits of engaging in a bout with Cotto and the prestige of defeating such a great fighter is that it is literally an offer I cannot refuse." The IBF refused to reconsider and vacated the title. Clottey beat Zab Judah in August to win the vacant belt, but never defended it.





  • #2
    So Cotto taking too much time is the reason this isn't for two eggs instead of one.

    Comment


    • #3
      and the nerve of some cats to blame Clottey yersterday........Clottey catchin' Cotto at the right time........how the fück he gonna win a hard fight when he can't even get the easy part right.......signing the contract and gettin' it in by the deadline......or he was havin' second thoughts

      Comment


      • #4
        Now it's Cotto's fault...lol..

        Comment


        • #5
          Or maybe Clottey should have fought his mandatory around February instead of sitting around. Cotto fought in February while Clottey was sitting around waiting while he could have taken care of his mandatory. It's Clottey's fault, it was Clottey's belt and Clottey's mandatory.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by RTS View Post
            Or maybe Clottey should have fought his mandatory around February instead of sitting around. Cotto fought in February while Clottey was sitting around waiting while he could have taken care of his mandatory. It's Clottey's fault, it was Clottey's belt and Clottey's mandatory.
            I agree with that

            Comment


            • #7
              Without the tittle unification, this is a risky fight with little benefits
              for Cotto.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP