If Wlad Loses He MUST Retire.

[Jean28]

Why should he retire if he loses? He has been a successful boxer so far. Good boxers dont retire after just 1 loss. They start winning again and recover their place in the top.

[cuzfozzy]

wlad has not had a challenge in years. who knows haye might
be the man to do it. maybe this will be the bowe holyfield of this era

[STILL DETOX]

After getting the crap knocked out of him by some CWs, Haye decides to go to HW and get a title without earning it. Makes sense to me.

lol @ those knockdowns...and btw, haye won the first 2 fights by KO

2nd knockdown wasnt even ruled a kncokdown..

3rd, he was beating thompson till he ran out of gas

[ottoevans]

sorry wont happen

[Spray_resistant]

You are such a douche Infern0, and your constant hate for Wlad is so irrational.

[Welter_Skelter]

Seriously, If Wlad ends the night crawling around the ring on all fours again, or taking an early nights sleep again that has to be the end of him. Haye "supposedly" wasn't even the greatest C/W, so if Wlad gets taken out by him its over.






If this gets seen again it's bye bye wlad.

[Jesse Pinkman]

Wlad will win easy time. His jab and power will carry the day.

[Steak]

obviously hes not going to retire if he loses, he has a double rematch clause, dont he?

so we get to see Haye obliterate him and his brother more than once

[Dorian]

David Haye and His "PAPI"

[PACBOY]

^^^^ this ****** gave me a red rep :wank: on ur grandma

and yea i wanna see wlad go to sleep.

head to the good karma thread