Now, state your ***ing logic. Why should a guy who faced no fighter of consequence deserve a shot at the pound for pound king? Just because he's good and a dangerous fighter isn't a good enough reason for Pacquiao to fight a virtually unknown fighter (to the mass) and for a much smaller paycheck at that. I'm sick of hearing all the "scouts" who say they knew Valero was so special since his mother was pregnant with him. I'm also sick of these same pea brained ******s who thinks Pacquiao should fight him because he's good, dangerous or whatever. No boxing doesn't work that way, a fighter has to earn their right at the top fighters. And Valero is in the upper end of the middle pack while Pacquiao is at the top. So shut your dumbasses until Valero fights and wins 4-5 fights against quality name opponents. This is not about if Valero can beat him or not, nobody knows that yet. What we do know is Valero doesn't deserve a shot, YET. So please use your dumb ***ing heads and shut the *** up.
:wt:
:wt:
Comment