Hatton Will Never Be The Best

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • baracuda
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 10779
    • 259
    • 569
    • 11,470

    #51
    Originally posted by hammerhiem
    You're still fcuking wrong 38 out of 46 in the UK is not 90%.
    38 out of 46 in england which is around 83% like i said.on the other 17% includes a controversial win over collazo and an ugly win over urango.the remaining 5 fights was a loss to floyd,and yes a very impressive win vs castillo,and 4 wins vs unknown fighters.
    Last edited by baracuda; 04-16-2009, 03:44 PM.

    Comment

    • Fighting Champ
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 136
      • 5
      • 1
      • 6,184

      #52
      So he wants Manny Pacquiao to then retire? He said that Ricky Hatton was knocked out and hurt before, trying to discredit Manny Pacquiao if he beats Hatton. But then what credit should Floyd Mayweather get for beating Jose Luis Castillo, Sharmba Mitchell, Oscar De La Hoya, Zap Judah, Arturo Gatti and Genaro Hernandez? All these fighters were knocked out before ever fighting Mayweather.

      Comment

      • hammerhiem
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 4877
        • 129
        • 102
        • 11,163

        #53
        Originally posted by baracuda
        38 out of 46 in england which is around 83% like i said.on the other 17% includes a controversial win over collazo and an ugly win over urango.the remaining 5 fights was a loss to floyd,and yes a very impressive win vs castillo,and 4 wins vs unknown fighters.
        Malinaggi isn't unknown... just kidding i know what you are driving at

        the Collazo figth isn't controversial it was just close, frankly most people think the KD won Hatton the fight, the minority are just louder and repeat it alot, the rest of us are just sick of trying to point out that close doesn't = controversial.

        Ottke vs Ried = controversial
        Ottke vs Johnson = Close

        Theres a big difference.

        Could you point me in the direction of a controversial Hatton fight in the UK please because frankly there isn't any, unless you subscibe to the bull**** Tzsyu was fixed theory.

        Comment

        • baracuda
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 10779
          • 259
          • 569
          • 11,470

          #54
          Originally posted by hammerhiem
          Malinaggi isn't unknown... just kidding i know what you are driving at

          the Collazo figth isn't controversial it was just close, frankly most people think the KD won Hatton the fight, the minority are just louder and repeat it alot, the rest of us are just sick of trying to point out that close doesn't = controversial.

          Ottke vs Ried = controversial
          Ottke vs Johnson = Close

          Theres a big difference.

          Could you point me in the direction of a controversial Hatton fight in the UK please because frankly there isn't any, unless you subscibe to the bull**** Tzsyu was fixed theory.
          agreed.actually i would'nt call it controversial but i was just not impressed with how the fight turned out vs tszyu and i don't buy that fixed theory either.but i believe he had the advantage because the ref let him get away with alot of what many including i consider dirty tactics.but like someone already said, a win is a win, some are good and some are ugly.

          Comment

          • cuzfozzy
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2004
            • 2884
            • 112
            • 0
            • 3,126

            #55
            if that ref was in charge of all title fights akinwande and ruiz would
            be champions right now ....

            Comment

            • Dragon Punch
              Contender
              • Feb 2009
              • 304
              • 8
              • 0
              • 6,357

              #56
              Originally posted by FasTHarD
              Maybe.

              I didn't say about how United Kingdom to be the best boxing place that no bad dicisions ever made. I just trying to imply how Hatton could be DQ'd by how the he fights and by those dirty tactics he is doing before. That's the main reason i present Cortez name exposing those tactics that he is using for years in the Mayweather fight. Wrestlers deserve to be in WWE not in boxing or else you will end up getting DQ'd.
              What is you're definition of dirty fighting? if it is ''hit and hold'' can I assume that you are also classing the following fighters as dirty: Hopkins, Mosely, PBF, Toney to name a few fighers you have utilised ''hit and hold'' tactics - or are these fighters judged differently then Hatton??

              My definition of dirty fighting is: headbutting, Elbowing, raking gloves in the opponents face, rabbit punching and lowblow's etc. Apart from the Tsyzu fight where BOTH fighters used roughouse tactics please can you post example's were ricky has demonstrated the above - preferably with visual evidence (there's plenty of his old and newer fights on youtube).

              Comment

              • cuzfozzy
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2004
                • 2884
                • 112
                • 0
                • 3,126

                #57
                no one hits and holds as much as hatton (except ruiz and akinwande)
                but everyone is entitled to their opinion .....

                thomas hearns is the real hit man ... thats how a hit man fights

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP