Was the ref biased in the Tszyu/Hatton?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cuzfozzy
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2004
    • 2884
    • 112
    • 0
    • 3,126

    #21
    hatton even got away with a blatant low blow with full power on it
    did the ref do anything ? of course not ..

    Comment

    • Sox8055
      *PLAYBOY*
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 6229
      • 206
      • 279
      • 13,599

      #22
      If we are talking about huggers, then lets include Hopkins in that list, his victories over DLH and Tito were cheats...

      Comment

      • Ray*
        Be safe!!!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 44867
        • 1,654
        • 1,608
        • 558,890

        #23
        Any highlight reel of the fight???

        Comment

        • baracuda
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 10779
          • 259
          • 569
          • 11,470

          #24
          Originally posted by Al Coholic
          The ref didn't make Tszyu quit Hatton did.
          if you get hit by cheap shots and don't see your opponent getting penalized,do you see a point of continueing?

          Comment

          • Cortezsucks
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 182
            • 8
            • 0
            • 229

            #25
            Originally posted by baracuda
            i've seen some bad refereeing but the ref in the tszu/hatton fight was the worst so far!i've never seen a ref that actually allows fighters to clinch so excessively and use elbows and headbutts without taking out points.hopefully i would never ever have to see a ref like that again.tony weeeks,kenny bayless,raul caiz,joe cortez and jay nady are pretty good IMO


            Nady, Cortez WTF

            Comment

            • Cortezsucks
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 182
              • 8
              • 0
              • 229

              #26
              He was fair he let them get on with it.

              A biast ref will warn excessively and take points.

              Comment

              • SKULLSPLITTER
                Banned
                • Feb 2009
                • 104
                • 26
                • 3
                • 141

                #27
                Was the ref biased in the Tszyu/Hatton?
                LMAOOOO!!

                Does a bear **** in woods??

                Is the Pope Catholic??


                and seeing how 19 people have voted "No" as of right now...


                Does this forum have an overabundance of ****ed up garbage fans??




                was the ref biased in Hatton-Tszyu....lol

                Comment

                • comanick
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 349
                  • 44
                  • 0
                  • 7,526

                  #28
                  [QUOTE=Sox8055;5077407]If we are talking about huggers, then lets include Hopkins in that list, his victories over DLH and Tito were cheats...[/QUOT

                  well I guess you never watched those fights or you are just being sarcastic because these are 2 fights where he probably held the least. But with that said im going to vote yes the ref was bias. I havent watched the fight in a while but 2 things that stick in my mind was when zoo dropped hatton with a body shot that was ruled a "slip" and that blatant low blow he hit zoo with was crazy and all he got was a warning( mind you that he did it right after the ref was warning zoo for goin low then right after that he popped him-that was intentional imo) and lets not forget all of the holding.

                  Comment

                  • The_Visitation
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 1570
                    • 49
                    • 24
                    • 7,791

                    #29
                    Originally posted by D3adpool
                    What do you think

                    I won't vote, I'll let all you vote since I clearly have a biased viewpoint, because I think Hatton has won most of his big-fights by clinching excessively
                    No more biased than Cortez was in favour of Mayweather.

                    Look, people. Like fighters, referees have different styles, and opinions as to what 'excessive' clinching may be. Clinching is part of the game, and all fighters do it when the situation requires, even those nuthugged by the hate-Hatton contingent. Good fighters also know how to handle it. One approach does not make a referee 'biased' any more than another.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP