How come

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kevin Jesus
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 7723
    • 280
    • 514
    • 8,467

    #1

    How come

    Some posters say the Winky that fought Williams is not the same Winky that fought Tito/Mosley? Looks like the same ear-muff-defense Winky to me. Would it be any different if the Wright from 05 came to 09 and fought Paul that night?
    can someone tell me how the 2005 Winky can beat a 27 year old Williams still throwing 1000 punches a fight.
    Please explain your answer in a complete sentence.
    Thank you.
  • mellow_mood
    BORICUA 110%
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 14133
    • 297
    • 614
    • 20,603

    #2
    Originally posted by Kevin Jesus
    Some posters say the Winky that fought Williams is not the same Winky that fought Tito/Mosley? Looks like the same ear-muff-defense Winky to me. Would it be any different if the Wright from 05 came to 09 and fought Paul that night?
    can someone tell me how the 2005 Winky can beat a 27 year old Williams still throwing 1000 punches a fight.
    Please explain your answer in a complete sentence.
    Thank you.
    kid i usually dont do this..

    but dont be ******..

    thats pretty easy like 1 + 1 = 2

    he was more old ... he was more innactive than ever..

    we are not saying that winky of 05 would have beat williams...

    winkys style is tailor made for williams.. @ any time...

    but to say that is the same. .is beyond ******ity

    Comment

    • TRAVI$
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 6226
      • 351
      • 699
      • 9,891

      #3
      That's just like saying Roy isn't passed his prime because he still showboats and fights stylistically the same.

      Comment

      • Kevin Jesus
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 7723
        • 280
        • 514
        • 8,467

        #4
        Originally posted by mellow_mood
        kid i usually dont do this..

        but dont be ******..

        thats pretty easy like 1 + 1 = 2

        he was more old ... he was more innactive than ever..

        we are not saying that winky of 05 would have beat williams...

        winkys style is tailor made for williams.. @ any time...

        but to say that is the same. .is beyond ******ity
        ????????????? Lol..........

        Comment

        • VaBoriKua 2.0
          Banned
          • Aug 2007
          • 3995
          • 110
          • 47
          • 4,417

          #5
          Originally posted by mellow_mood
          kid i usually dont do this..

          but dont be ******..

          thats pretty easy like 1 + 1 = 2

          he was more old ... he was more innactive than ever..

          we are not saying that winky of 05 would have beat williams...

          winkys style is tailor made for williams.. @ any time...

          but to say that is the same. .is beyond ******ity
          Exactly. Were saying that Winky was best at 154 pounds. Second he was younger when he fought mosley and tito and hadnt gone 2 years with inactivity. When you start getting older you start slowing down and your legs start going. We are not saying winky would have beat him like mellow mood said were just saying its not winky at his best. Williams would have probably beat winky 4 years ago ass winky doesnt do much other than come forward and block so most likely williams would of won, but you cant deny that 37 year old winky fighting at 160 with a 2 year layoff is the same winky that fought and beat mosley and tito

          Comment

          • KingTito
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2006
            • 9391
            • 234
            • 350
            • 22,960

            #6
            Winky was obviously not at his best, but I still think Paul would've beaten him.

            Comment

            • ellwise69
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 514
              • 8
              • 18
              • 7,526

              #7
              Originally posted by mellow_mood
              kid i usually dont do this..

              But dont be ******..

              Thats pretty easy like 1 + 1 = 2

              he was more old ... He was more innactive than ever..

              We are not saying that winky of 05 would have beat williams...

              Winkys style is tailor made for williams.. @ any time...

              But to say that is the same. .is beyond ******ity
              close thread.

              Comment

              • Kevin Jesus
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 7723
                • 280
                • 514
                • 8,467

                #8
                Okay good now we're actually saying Williams would have beaten the 2005 Winky or any Winky. Good, discrediting a boxer is bad for boxing.

                Comment

                • VaBoriKua 2.0
                  Banned
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 3995
                  • 110
                  • 47
                  • 4,417

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Kevin Jesus
                  Okay good now we're actually saying Williams would have beaten the 2005 Winky or any Winky. Good, discrediting a boxer is bad for boxing.
                  To be honest with you i think the fight would have been closer. I do think Williams would have won though because his style is hard for someone who has winkys style

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP