Calzaghe vs Wright at 168

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ACHlLLES
    watch ur mouth
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 8398
    • 236
    • 359
    • 15,211

    #1

    Calzaghe vs Wright at 168

    I think Calzaghe would have won, but I'm a biased fan of Calzaghes. So what do you all think? Seems like Williams High-workrate gave Winky huge problems. And Winky didn't seem to find out a way to stop or slow down Williams work-rate. Could winky stop Calz's workrate?
    13
    Joe Calzaghe by decision
    76.92%
    10
    Joe Calzaghe by KO
    15.38%
    2
    Ronald Wright by decision
    7.69%
    1
    Ronald Wright by KO
    0.00%
    0
    Last edited by ACHlLLES; 04-13-2009, 02:24 PM.
  • Kevin Jesus
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 7723
    • 280
    • 514
    • 8,467

    #2
    Calzaghe wins this due to work rate. Only fighter out there that can give Calzaghe problems(work-rate wise) is Paul Williams. Hopkins can give Calzaghe problems but like the first fight, by making it ugly.

    Comment

    • THE REED
      Sixty Forty
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2007
      • 43489
      • 1,992
      • 1,483
      • 690,068,075

      #3
      Personally, its a no-brainer.

      I dont think anyone would pick winky.

      Comment

      • tennesseeboy
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 647
        • 31
        • 0
        • 7,136

        #4
        joe c by a mile..

        Comment

        • -Antonio-
          -Antonio-
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2005
          • 24259
          • 629
          • 163
          • 38,153

          #5
          I'm kind of glad Williams proved to everyone what Calz would have done because that was one of the matchups I never understood. Calzaghe beats Winky 100 times out of 100. Yet it was still something like 50-50 on here when people would make polls.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP