Wilfredo Gomez or Erik Morales
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
You don't need the ed at the end of beat in that sentence. Beat is a word that doesn't ever use the ed for past tense... it just stays as beat. Just an FYI!
But, I mean... he was undefeated. No one beat him.
Cotto was undefeated at 140... does that mean he would never, ever possibly lose at that weight? That kind of logic is flawed.
No one beat Morales at 122 either...Comment
-
-
Gomz fought 80% of his career at 122, and fought all he best 122 pounders t the moment. So your comeback logic is ******.You don't need the ed at the end of beat in that sentence. Beat is a word that doesn't ever use the ed for past tense... it just stays as beat. Just an FYI!
But, I mean... he was undefeated. No one beat him.
Cotto was undefeated at 140... does that mean he would never, ever possibly lose at that weight? That kind of logic is flawed.
No one beat Morales at 122 either...
At 122, he was a moster, like I said, it took a ATG, with good power and great skills to beat him and in ther weight.
At 122, he KTFO EM!!!!!!!Comment
-
My comeback logic was nothing more than a question of your insistence that Gomez is invincible because no one beat him at 122, which is obviously a terrible way to look at things.
But whatever, it's pretty obvious you have less than 0 interest in actually discussing this, because your mind is 100% made up that Morales gets KTFO. So... I think we've pretty much settled whatever discussion we could get out of this.Comment
-
-
-
-
Comment

Comment