can edwin valero be compared to an early shane mosley?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • krispy kreme
    Fiendin for toilet water
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 10832
    • 358
    • 898
    • 18,913

    #11
    Originally posted by ALPHA O' MEGA
    shane's skills are overrated.shane was almost like a lightweight version of jermain taylor, with a BIT better footwork.valero is just a gunner.dude is made for tv.
    I didn't watch too many fights with Shane at 135, but he didn't have that jab Taylor has, or did he?

    Comment

    • AntonTheMeh
      STOP CRYIN
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 21222
      • 700
      • 709
      • 31,623

      #12
      Originally posted by Tek My Pounches
      I didn't watch too many fights with Shane at 135, but he didn't have that jab Taylor has, or did he?
      decent..

      Comment

      • ShalafiV.2
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 526
        • 25
        • 11
        • 626

        #13
        Originally posted by hookoutofhell
        i think shane had much better fundamentals.

        valero is more like a young pacman.
        I agree, too careless.

        Comment

        • Pullcounter
          no guts no glory
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2004
          • 42582
          • 549
          • 191
          • 49,739

          #14
          Originally posted by southpaw2884
          not in the skill level per say but his gameness and the fact that he is willing to stay in the pocket shane mosley has a record of 46 5 39 ko's that like 75%ko percentage
          sorry but mosley is better than valero in every category... valero hasn't even fought a gatekeeper at 130 or 135!!!

          honestly, that's just plain disrespectful to mosley

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP