If you could trash one of the alphabet belts...

[Steak]

They all have their faults, and all lack authenticity. but its still annoying to have 4 belts in a division. seems like half the telelvised fights nowadays are called title fights, which is a joke.

If you could get rid of one right now, which one would you choose to get rid of first?

I would easily pick the WBO. I dont recongnise them as a title belt nowadays anyway, but I would be happy if the rest of boxing community followed suite. They have NO historical significance, they never enforce mandatories, the mandatories they do enforce are awful(which means that the champion very rarely will ever face anyone even in the top ten...see Zsolt Erdie, Joe Calzaghe early career), and seem to have an interim champ for half the weight classes.

[pistol whip]

One? How about all of those worthless trinkets!!!

[larryx]

ibf-easy...and the wba at heavyweight

[NakiFan]

WBO

or WWE

[larryx]

all we need is the wbc...trash all the rest

[Steak]

One? How about all of those worthless trinkets!!!

We need one belt. cant have boxing without a world title. and dont give me the RING belt, they cant enforce mandatories and cant strip the champion, they cant be a real belt.

first things first. we cant wake up and magically have all the belts removed. one belt at a time.

[MANGLER]

They all suck, but the WBA is twice as bad cuz of the whole super champ ****.

[Verstyle]

You win the WBC you are a true world champion. Ok, I'm lying, but it looks real good and a good establishment.

[larryx]

but then again sulliman ****s it up for the wbc so **** them too

[-Mustang-]

all we need is the wbc...trash all the rest

right on larry i was thinking the same thing... but the wba sucks most... if i had to chose only one