Damn Taylor is so underrated nowadays...
If Froch Beats Taylor?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Triangle theory dude... it doesn't work. You know this already!
Those "wins" were arguable, Tunney. There are plenty of people who felt it could have gone either way in both fights, and plenty of people who felt 'Nard won. Hopkins should have been busier, he didn't do enough.
But if we must bring triangle theory into it, let's bear in mind that Taylor lost twice to Pavlik... and Pavlik was annihilated by Hopkins.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3Comment
-
That's true, but Taylor has been competitive with world-class opponents, while Froch has never really fought anybody who's world-class.Triangle theory dude... it doesn't work. You know this already!
Those "wins" were arguable, Tunney. There are plenty of people who felt it could have gone either way in both fights, and plenty of people who felt 'Nard won. Hopkins should have been busier, he didn't do enough.
But if we must bring triangle theory into it, let's bear in mind that Taylor lost twice to Pavlik... and Pavlik was annihilated by Hopkins.
Pascal is a decent fighter, but obviously not on the same level as Taylor's opponents such as Hopkins and Pavlik.Comment
-
Doesn't need to work in this case, Froch hasn't fought no wheres near the competition as taylor. Taylors defense is also superior to Frochs, Taylor does everything better then Froch. Speed, Power, and movement. I use the word power because Froch has basically only ko'd journeyman. This isn't a little step-up for Froch it's a huge one.Comment
-
Comment