Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you think Hopkins is the Best of this decade????

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by the_bringer View Post
    the question is "is he the best of the last decade", at 18 motherfuckers voted "no! Not close!".

    That's staggering to me.

    In the past 10 years hopkins has fought..........

    Allen
    echols
    vanderpool
    echols
    holmes
    trinidad
    daniels
    hakkar
    joppy
    allen
    de la hoya
    eastman
    taylor
    taylor
    tarver
    wright
    calzaghe
    pavlik

    who else even comes close to that? Roy? In the last decade roy's faced.....

    Frazier
    johnson
    telesco
    hall
    harding
    harmon
    gonzalez
    kelly
    woods
    ruiz
    tarver
    tarver
    johnson
    tarver
    ajamu
    hanshaw
    trinidad
    calzaghe
    sheika

    in the last decade hopkins is 15-3, with landmark wins over prime tito, oscar, winky, pavlik, and tarver. And even his 3 losses were close, razor thin decisions that are hotly debated to this day.

    In the last decade roy is 15-4, with landmark wins over tarver the first time (which should've been another loss), ruiz, woods, hanshaw, and the bloated corpse of a guy who looks like felix trinidad.


    Roy, you can make a case for, and i wouldn't fault you for. But who else could possibly be above hopkins in the last 10 years?

    Mayweather? He doesn't even come close. Pacquiao? Doubtful.
    i agree 100%

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by antworst View Post
      Why not? He beat you boyfriend popkins.
      Because Cal-Slappy won, but as everybody see's it as what it is. A gift decision.

      Comment


      • #43
        gota give him credit,hes 43 and in his last 2 fights fought 2 undefeated champions (both moving up in weight though) and destroyed pavlik and gave calzaghe a very tough fight,hes incredible 4 his age

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by dde91 View Post
          i agree 100%
          The way I see it, you can only make a case for either Roy or Bernard.

          That's it.

          Everybody else is playing catch up.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by dde91 View Post
            Because Cal-Slappy won, but as everybody see's it as what it is. A gift decision.
            lol ur still bitter about that,u must be a die-hard fan,and a deluded one

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by british_fan View Post
              lol ur still bitter about that,u must be a die-hard fan,and a deluded one
              I mean if he won by SD, and B-Hop should get a rematch. and B-Hop is 44. Shows how much greater B-Hop is then Calzaghe.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by dde91 View Post
                I mean if he won by SD, and B-Hop should get a rematch. and B-Hop is 44. Shows how much greater B-Hop is then Calzaghe.
                hopkins has a better legacy,i never said he didnt.but calzaghe still beat him,end of

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by british_fan View Post
                  hopkins has a better legacy,i never said he didnt.but calzaghe still beat him,end of
                  i said he beat him, but a rematch should have been done.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by dde91 View Post
                    i said he beat him, but a rematch should have been done.
                    ye i agree,but the first fight was so boring it was never guna happen

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by british_fan View Post
                      ye i agree,but the first fight was so boring it was never guna happen
                      true datttt

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP